- Joined
- Oct 23, 2022
- Messages
- 1,064
- Reaction score
- 12,492
I just started watching this and really wish I hadn't![]()
I dread to imagine!
I just started watching this and really wish I hadn't![]()
The collision avoidance system doesn't work below a certain level because there are so many planes on the ground it would be going all the time. The aircraft would have to be at a certain height above ground level for it to kick in.
It does appear that the helicopter pilot probably misjudged the distance and speed, possibly even the size of the plane as well.ATC switched runways on approach to 33 which is further north than the regular landing path.. but if it was visual by the helicopter, clearly the jet was not where the helicopter thought it would be.
'
I saw a flight radar (not sure it was legit) that showed flight 5342 steady and arcing regularly for runway 33, but the helicopter abruptly turned to the east towards the plane. Looks to me like the helicopter pilot misjudged the distances and speeds involved and was their fault.
Prayers for the souls on board.![]()
I believe I read they were both 10—currently looking for the source where I found that info stated. In figure skating’s juvenile category the boys can be 13 or younger, girls can be 12 or younger.
The families need to be gently told that there is no way those demands can be met. NTSB investigations for even small (as in truly small, Cessna type crashes) can take 6 months or more. Large passenger plane crashes can take 12 months and more.Media is demanding answers now.
That is a possibility. At night, there are fewer visual references for the eyes and the mind to use when judging speed, size and distance.It does appear that the helicopter pilot probably misjudged the distance and speed, possibly even the size of the plane as well.
I thought about that and I agree , however I'm thinking the reporter would've asked him before videoing -- if it was ok to speak to him, on record ?
And maybe the husband didn't yet know for sure or was in shock and said 'yes', he'd be willing to answer some questions.
I can't imagine being in this poor man's place -- but part of me might want to talk to a reporter and get my questions out there --- as in, hypothetically speaking -- "WHY did this happen and I want to know if anyone was at fault, I want answers and if there was carelessness that led to this tragedy, someone needs to be held responsible, etc. ?
Not like the reporter knew much yet, but in his line of work he may be able to ask the husbands' questions for him.
There are military pressers going to happen for the helicopter crew, one would assume, and also pressers addressing the army's side of this disaster, correct ?
We've been told the chopper crew wasn't inexperienced.
So that reporter could maybe get into one and speak for him.
Just throwing that out there, and hope it made sense.
![]()
Man reveals chilling last words with wife on doomed flight
A man whose wife was on the doomed American Airlines Flight 5342 showed a reporter his heartbreaking final texts to her before the crash.www.dailymail.co.uk
From this link ^^^ here's a reaction from that reporter who spoke to Raza :
The WUSA reporter has described his conversation with Raza as 'one of the most heartbreaking interviews of my professional career'.
Omo.
Media is demanding answers now.
SBM. The Black Hawk might have been using a different frequency to communicate with ATC.5) ATC contacted Black Hawk a minute or so before collision to make sure they had visuals on AA 5342. But I did not hear a confirmation from Black Hawk to ATC. (or did I miss something?)
Some suggest that the helicopter pilot was monitoring a different CRJ that was taking off at the time. If only ATC told him the direction which the conflicting traffic was coming from.
IMO they did not see the CRJ. They probably would/could have avoided it if they did. The CRJ could not change its course quickly.It does appear that the helicopter pilot probably misjudged the distance and speed, possibly even the size of the plane as well.
Agree, certainly there was a series of mistakes that occurred here. Not just one. It is well known that ATC is overwhelmed and lots of upgrades are necessary and long past due. Hopefully we can get this done.
As many as fourteen figure skaters feared dead.
Six on the flight were from the same club in Boston - two skaters, two coaches, two mothers.
May not be much of a mystery. I’m guessing it may be protocol in a VIP mission training exercise to replicate the same conditions and scenarios that would be utilized in a live operation - including the use of actual call numbers as priority air transport. Basically, like a final rehearsal."Doomed Black Hawk helicopter's call sign
sparks fresh mystery following DC plane crash.
View attachment 561554
The Black Hawk was marked as a PAT 25,
which stands for priority air transport
and is usually reserved for when the Army is conducting VIP missions,
such as having officials onboard.
The Army
has confirmed no officials were onboard the aircraft,
which was carrying three soldiers, a standard sized crew."
![]()
Black Hawk helicopter's call sign sparks mystery following DC crash
The military aircraft was conducting a training flight, but some aren't buying it due to the priority call sign and the experience that is required of Black Hawk pilotswww.dailymail.co.uk
What I think we know now:
1) Flight AA 5342 was given clearance to change from runway 1 to runway 33 which is further north and east.
2) Black Hawk came in from the land mass between Potomac and Washington Channel basically heading south
3) Flight path shows AA 5342 veering left towards runway 33 about a half a mile north of the "regular" runway 1.
4) Flight AA 5342 did not change its trajectory. Angled semicircle to line up with RW 1.
5) ATC contacted Black Hawk a minute or so before collision to make sure they had visuals on AA 5342. But I did not hear a confirmation from Black Hawk to ATC. (or did I miss something?)
6) The two collided in the Potomac about an eight of a mile from runway 33.
What I think I would like to know:
1) Did the Black Hawk ever acknowledge the message from ATC that they were supposed to look out for the air craft?
2) Assuming I was correct in seeing 2 planes lined behind AA 5342 to the south, was there also maybe a previous plane ahead of AA 5342 that landed ahead of AA 5342 but on runway 1 and thus maybe the Black Hawk thought that is the way that AA 5342 would go? I know this is not how it is supposed to work leaving way too much to chance.
3) Did the Black Hawk have a collision avoidance system and was it on or is it turned off when they go into night vision mode? Also, is there a black box for the helicopter that could shed light on cockpit voice communications and sounds?
4) Why (allegedly) did the ATC give such short notice to the Black Hawk. Was it because he got a warning on his radar system?
I am just like everyone that wants to know the answers and will just have to wait to see what the conclusion is when all the evidence is known and documented.
The video below includes the audio between the tower and PAT25 where the helicopter pilot confirms visual with the plane and seeks approval to pass.SBM. The Black Hawk might have been using a different frequency to communicate with ATC.
This one is very sad for me, so I work at the Springfield Branson Airport and I fuel UH 60 Blackhawks daily. From watching videos and listening to ATC, it almost sounds like the Blackhawk crossed into the path of the PSA. The blackhawk was told to maintain visual separation, so I am not sure if they got disoriented somehow or what.
The VASAviation videos I linked up thread show the ADS-B data for both aircraft up to the point of impact.Here is all about TCAS
![]()
Here’s What Air Traffic Collision Avoidance Systems Can And Can’t Do
While the Traffic Collision Avoidance System, or TCAS, was introduced as a backup to help prevent mid-air collisions, it has its limitations. While the Traffic Collision Avoidance System, or TCAS, was introduced as a backup to help prevent mid-air collisions, it has its limitations.www.twz.com
(spoiler alert: no, because they flew at 200-400 feet and 1000 feet of vertical separation is required).
I would like to know if Black Hawk was flying with transponders switched on because if they were switched off, it made it invisible on the radar.