Why is it a problem or considered overkill for a 3 week quarantine to protect the rest of your life?
If the only way to kill this very serious disease is to let it die off on its own - then do so.
Any one with a chance of having it should be quarantined and monitored in a humane and protective way.
It may be a hassle, but in reality having ebola is more of a hassle - and I would think that one should err on the side of caution.
Especially in this type of situation - I'm in favor of quarantining (is that a word?) flights or banning the flight to begin with, and
quarantine the individuals if they are from an infected area. It may not be a popular opinion but it is mine.
If quarantine and let the disease extinguish itself is going to be a way of stopping it,
why continue with a chance of spreading it to parts of the world or to people all over.
Just think if Duncan was quarantined from his flight, or because of his original location and was monitored and cared for,
would we be in this situation with more sick people and the chance of the wide spread epidemic. I value life, and if that
would mean making someone wait 21days to see if they will have a dangerous and deadly disease, so be it. If in that time
they were to come down with it, at least they know they could be getting help for it right at the onset. And if they don't have it,
Great, carry on. What did they lose, only some time, not their life.
All just my opinion, and I know it may not be others but that's ok - I just needed to state my own. I'm not looking for any
answers to my questions they were rhetorical anyway, sorry to interrupt but taking precaution is not necessarily panic.