I'm just catching up on a few pages of posts and several news articles.
It seems we now know it was a land lady, who did not live with them, and that the women had given her notice to vacate. What we don't know is why. We also don't know where, if anywhere, they intended to move to. It seems we don't even know exactly when they gave notice and when they planned to leave as all that has been wishy washy, and somewhat contradictory, in the press. Were they struggling financially? Had they planned to downgrade their accommodation? Move in with friends or a share house situation to save money? Call it quits and move back to Hungary? Call it quits permanently?
An exert from the article below:
Superintendent Howieson said: “In the days preceding their disappearance the sisters had indicated to the landlord that they intended to leave their tenancy.
“The timescale was pretty open-ended but obviously explicit enough that the landlady felt like an enquiry needed to be made.
“They carried out enquiries at the address which has led them to be concerned about the whereabouts of the sisters.
“This was specifically due to some materials and personal possessions that had been left within the address.”
TWO missing twins announced they were quitting their flat days before they vanished, cops revealed today. Eliza and Henrietta Hustzi told their landlady they were planning to move from the city cen…
www.thescottishsun.co.uk
I'm assuming this was a legal tenancy agreement, with a required amount of notice to be given? A few days (I assume 2 or 3 days?) prior to the Tuesday they gave notice. (Side note, they spoke with their mother on the Saturday beforehand....I believe it was about a 40 minute phone call. Is this normal for them?) To me, this would indicate they planned to leave in about a month, or are laws different in Scotland? Could it have been a short term rental place where you pay week to week? It seems like they gave notice and had planned to vacate all within a short period of time, but the fact it was "open ended" suggested nothing was set in stone. I wonder what made the landlady feel she needed to make enquiries so soon? I wonder whether their residence looked like they were planning on moving? Stuff packed up, or business as usual? I'm assuming they hadn't sold off or moved any belongings in the days prior or we'd know about it. Was there next to nothing in their home at the time the landlady entered? Did they usually live very sparsely? Had she entered before to see how they lived? Obviously something she saw gave her enough concern to get police involved. What are the "materials" listed in the article if not possessions? Something to indicate they had planned to "drink the cool aid" or similar? Illicit drugs? Plane tickets? I wouldn't describe plane tickets or the like as materials or possessions, more like "items". The fact that things "had been left within the address" suggests to me that they had moved most of their things out and that it was quite sparse. If you aren't in the process of moving, then things aren't "left", they're just there. Or am I reading too much into each line?
By all accounts, the sisters lived normal, quiet, almost boring, lives. Were employed, had friends and a social life. Still no mention of love interests though. Did they speak to any of their friends about money concerns, or the fact they were planning to move? (If indeed they were). It's not unusual to tie up lose ends before ending your life. Maybe giving notice to vacate was one of them. It would also explain a 2am walk by a dark river, with no people or cameras around. One article mentions it was a fairly direct route taken to the river, was that an error? From what I've gathered here, it seems it wasn't? Regardless, if it wasn't a choice to enter the river, then what were these quiet homebodies doing out, in a dark secluded area, at 2am on a random Tuesday?
I'd love to know the family dynamic here. Were these sisters the intrepid stars of the family, bravely making a better life for themselves in far away lands? Was the entire family proud of them for moving and seeking a better life? Did they financially help people back home? Were they getting financial help from home? What was their life like in Hungary? Poor, middle class, upper class? Are their other family members all employed? Did they have an extreme amount of pressure (external or internal) to succeed and felt like they were failing everyone? Had they ever been back home to visit, or have family visit them? And again, what brought them to Scotland in the first place?
All speculation and MOO.