Thanks to SwampMama for her wide-ranging research and sensitively written commentary about the issues cropping up in relation to this particular case.
It doesn't seem to me that the lack of discussion re religious beliefs on this thread is due to any restriction on discussion of religion, but rather on that the focus of this thread is the unfolding case of Jahi's surgery and post-surgical care vs. the interests of her family in that care which has been shaped, in part, by their religious beliefs.
IMO, there are a range of beliefs regarding the point at which a soul enters a body and at which point the soul leaves the body behind.
I don't think SM's posts are on topic since Jahi's family has brought up in mainstream media interviews the way their faith has impacted the way in which they are dealing with this crisis. This particular WS thread is not, IMO, a thread dealing with a philosophical debate over the existence or non-existence of a soul, as valuable and interesting as such a debate would be. It is not about a comparative analysis of the validity of competing philosophies. It is about a case in which a family is fighting for time to heal a teen by means of prayers, based on their particular faith. It is a case in which the courts are trying to balance the needs of that family with the secular needs of the hospital, and the science based results of the tests run by several physicians trying to determine whether or not this girl is dead.
Again, JMO, but I think people on this thread are examining the family's faith-based arguments and, IMO, SM's and other's comments regarding religious stands on this issue are providing a context that enables a lay-person, such as myself, with a broader understanding of the issue. For a deeper understanding, I would turn to a thread examining just the concepts of a soul within a particular religion.