You're right, I didn't catch that. I was thinking of John and Patsy as a couple when I was writing the post. My main point about the specific wording of the bill is that it leaves open every possibility of killer, just that the any Ramsey was involved somehow.You are referring to the Ramseys as if they are one person. The killer could be PR, JR or BR.
It is my belief the GJ did the best they could on evidence presented which indicated R involvement in a coverup and staging (eg RN written by PR) as well as fiber evidence. What they couldn’t say for sure is which R was the actual killer. That, imo, is why they were only able to issue true bills to reflect that reality, they were unsure which R killed JBR.
I also do not believe the killer was anyone other than a R.
IMHO
I saw a post on another thread saying it's impossible for the ransom note to be from Patsy AND have an intruder. I think it's within the realm of possibility, as in I'm sure if we all imagined as many scenarios as we have about the Ramseys or other suspects, we could do it.