KaaBoom
`·.¸¸ ><((((º> ...·´`·.¸¸ ><((((º>...·
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Messages
- 4,957
- Reaction score
- 3,206
Here is the recent case where a man killed a young woman while wearing one of those monitors. GPS is real time, but somebody has to watch it all the time for it to be actually monitored in real time. And it certainly doesn't appear that somebody is sitting there watching all these monitors in real time. So it provides a false sense of security.
"Police said he was wearing a GPS device while committing the killing, along with several other robberies and assaults, in and around the German Village area."
http://nbc4i.com/2017/07/11/lawmake...kle-monitors-following-murder-of-osu-student/
That does not back up your contention that electronic monitoring is not real time.
Exclusionary and inclusionary zones; outline where a parolee can or can not go. Golsby didn’t have any, and that means he could go anywhere he wanted, and GPS data was recorded and not monitored according to Boggs.
They didn't program his device correctly, so he had no exclusion zones. He could go anywhere he wanted. Electronic monitoring uses GPS. GPS is real time. That was human error not device error.