They did what they can legally do. Its easy in hindsight. They looked for ties to terror and they found none.
Having people adjudicated mental , or locked up because someone who is obviously in distress claims the Cia is controlling can not have their liberties taken, cause in hindsight we all know what he did.
Folks have this notion that there are places to put the severely mentally ill-- there are not- they were all let out
policy that led to the release of most of the nation's mentally ill patients from the hospital to the community is now widely regarded as a major failure.
cost-conscious policy makers,
Many of those patients who left the state hospitals never should have done so.
was a growing economic and political liability faced by state legislators. Enormous amounts of tax revenues were being used to support the state mental hospitals, and the institutions themselves were increasingly thought of as ''snake pits'' or facilities that few people wanted.
They closed em
Put it in the same context as many who declare its their right to have firearms - same thing - we just don't go around doing this stuff.
Same with Omar - they checked it out and found it bogus claims to terrorism.
What else were they supposed to do when data indicates that his problem is delusions not ISIS?
http://www.nytimes.com/1984/10/30/science/how-release-of-mental-patients-began.html?pagewanted=all