Myserty64 said:
Due to the fact there was no sign of a struggle in the condo it has been generally overlooked as a place where the abduction occured. It is worth noting there has been no sign of a struggle anywhere.
It was said the locks were never changed on her condo so anyone who lived there previously could have had a key and therefore access. That to me is a scary thought.
What on earth happened to Jennifer Kesse?
Mystery: And you wanted to give up your "wannabe detective badge". good points.
I couldn't agree with you more.
Given that no evidence that we know about has been found, how can one conclude the condo was not where a crime or a confrontation occurred?
When JK's car was found, there was no way LE could determine where the crime scene was? Unless I am missing something. We were told the car was clean.
Then, how can you exclude something as a crime scene, when you don't know where the crime occurred? Especially the last place JK was known to have been before going missing.
The only way LE could have concluded the crime occurred in the parking lot of JK's car, is if there was a witness or physical evidence, such as a purse, broken window, clothes, etc.
If this had occurred, LE would have known on that Tuesday that JK was endangered, and that complex, along with her condo, would have been torn apart, on that Tuesday!! IMO.
Another thing. We keep on hearing that JK's seat was pushed back too far. Well, Jk is taller than the POI. How does this make sense? PLus, where a driver's seat is positioned does not always reflect the height of the driver. Some like to be close to the wheel, while other's like to ride low in their seats. The only valuable info. would be if JK's seat was not in her position in which she normally drives, or of course, video.
Has anybody ever entertained the thought that LE only has the video of the POI, and a picture of JK's car driving by that camera, and so many seconds later, the POI is caught walking by? I think that is a possibility. IMO (PS, the clock being off one hour would not require another camera. Simply, looking at the current time, versus the time on that camera when examined. ) Although, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of the other camera at least catching the time the car was parked, if operational, of course.
left