GUILTY FL - Lonzie Barton, 2, Jacksonville, 24 July 2015 - #4

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #681
Why was the car parked earlier in day at the same address the car was discovered?
Weird! I believe EW was running super fast "without" his shirt (discovered on surveillance video) bc he thought they wouldn't be able to identify him.
 
  • #682
Why was the car parked earlier in day at the same address the car was discovered?
Weird! I believe EW was running super fast "without" his shirt (discovered on surveillance video) bc he thought they wouldn't be able to identify him.

Why his car was there earlier in the day ..is the million dollar question for which we have no answer yet. And no preliminary hearing to look forward to to learn the answer to that. :moo:
 
  • #683
i think that poster was assuming she had sole custody of him.... i actually dont think there was anything court ordered, i think she was dodging the dad.

It isn't a fact that Lonna is the sole guardian of Lonzie. I can only assume you are being sarcastic about your opinion.
 
  • #684
This is partly why I believe also she is covering something up. Jax sheriffs can say all they want that shes cooperating. I am not buying it. I understand she isnt a "suspect" yet so no one should mudsling at her. However knowing what we know about what "Ebron" did to little Lonzie, what mother will still show support for him and love him? UNLESS she is covering up something. Maybe in the end we are all being played as fools, maybe she did something and hes getting blamed and covering up. Who knows.. time will tell.

Edited to say.. that is IF Ebrons mother is telling the truth about this.


Maybe we are being played as fools, but I don't think JSO is. Whatever they are saying or doing, there is a very good reason for it. There are too many highly functioning BS-Meters working on the case for LL to play them as fools. I think Hackney's BS meter is at genius level and if anything he is playing everyone involved in Lonzie's disappearance for fools.

WRE's mother is telling her own truth, however accurate or inaccurate it may be. I can empathize with her to a certain point. I can't imagine how difficult it would be to accept what she has to come to terms with.

Always, JMO
 
  • #685
Thanks to all who posted upstream about LB FB page. There are some very interesting comments there!

ps ... initials of LL name on posts pls?

Im so confused after reading most that is on FB but mostly sad that LB had such a 🤬🤬🤬.? family structure imo. damn where was child services?!! and double damn....why did these peeps still have custody after drug incidents. WTH?????
 
  • #686
Thanks to all who posted upstream about LB FB page. There are some very interesting comments there!

ps ... initials of LL name on posts pls?

Im so confused after reading most that is on FB but mostly sad that LB had such a 🤬🤬🤬.? family structure imo. damn where was child services?!! and double damn....why did these peeps still have custody aftero drug incidents. WTH?????
but IMO bird brain opinion...Eb is not only one who know where or what happened to Lonzie and I still think whatever it was was preplanned aka premeditated. Hinky meter on LL.
 
  • #687
Question: Did i miss this....was there only ONE car for this family of ? And that car was the one so called stolen?
 
  • #688
i know we cannot link victim or other ppl's fb but i thought we could suspect or the search pages?
 
  • #689
i know we cannot link victim or other ppl's fb but i thought we could suspect or the search pages?

I might be wrong, it happens from time to time :)
 
  • #690
Question: Did i miss this....was there only ONE car for this family of ? And that car was the one so called stolen?

Oh dear ...I am not up to speed . The car was stolen ? I don't recall that. Link ?
 
  • #691
Yes she was and apparently there were "custody issues" according to an earlier article. Unless someone has proof that she was the sole guardian then that is an incorrect and misleading statement

What was misleading in my post. TIA
 
  • #692
Oh dear ...I am not up to speed . The car was stolen ? I don't recall that. Link ?

Not really, Suspect said that car was stolen and Lonzie was in it.
 
  • #693
  • #694
We aren't allowed to link any FB pages

Are we not allowed to link the 'Help Find Lonzie Barton' FB page? I'm sure I've linked it previously. Sorry if I missed something. VERY Interesting comments on there by RB, under the article posted 17 hours ago
 
  • #695
Oh .. Got it ! Suspect was saying car and baby was stolen. :blush:

Actually he called to report car stolen and then baby in it. Car seemed to be top priority.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
  • #696
Oh dear ...I am not up to speed . The car was stolen ? I don't recall that. Link ?

No the car wasn't stolen ATL. Ebron claimed it was, with Lonzie inside. LE proved he was lying.
 
  • #697
Oh dear ...I am not up to speed . The car was stolen ? I don't recall that. Link ?
This entire thread started with that as the main premise. Please see post #1 in thread #1 for more details.
 
  • #698
  • #699
Folks, I realize that not much news is coming out lately, but that doesn't mean the thread is going to go down the twisting Facebook rumor road.

Also, it's a good time to welcome new members and a reminder of the rules, the following in particular.



Social Networks

Regarding Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and other social networking or blog websites: Links may be used to direct posters to view something on a social networking page. But postings on social networking sites are not considered fact; they are rumor.

Copying and pasting, or taking screen caps, directly from these pages is not allowed. Paraphrasing is okay. (Exception: If the Twitter or Facebook post belongs to a verified news station, it may be copied. But a link should still be provided.)

Also, social networking pages may only be linked if they are directly related to a case, i.e. the victim or suspect.

We don't want to post to someone's mother, brother, employer, milkman, or postal carrier just because they know the main player.

Victim Friendly

Websleuths is a victim friendly forum. Attacking or bashing a victim is not allowed. Discussing victim behavior, good or bad is fine, but do so in a civil and constructive way, and only when such behavior is relevant to the case.

The "victim friendly" rule extends to the family members of victims and suspects. Sleuthing family members, friends, and others who have not been designated as suspects is not allowed. Don't make random accusations, suggest their involvement, nor bash and attack them. Posting their personal information, including names, addresses, and background data -- even if it is public -- is not allowed. That does not mean, however, that statements made by family members and other third parties cannot come into discussion as the facts of the case are reported in the media.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?65798-Etiquette-amp-Information

Thank you
 
  • #700
Actually he called to report car stolen and then baby in it. Car seemed to be top priority.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

That reminds me of the Delano Wilson case where the Dad calls 911 to say he's been mugged and oh yea, they took the baby too...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
95
Guests online
2,926
Total visitors
3,021

Forum statistics

Threads
632,112
Messages
18,622,153
Members
243,022
Latest member
MelnykLarysa
Back
Top