This idea of a contract killer, is there a reason to assume that this might have been the case?
IMO a contract killer would not kill with so much rage, or specifically target the groin area. Get it over and done with and be gone. Don't make a bloody mess of it.
Again IMO, it seems more likely that either the perp had a personal grudge against KC, or a grudge against women in general and KC happened to be around.
This idea of a contract killer, is there a reason to assume that this might have been the case?
IMO a contract killer would not kill with so much rage, or specifically target the groin area. Get it over and done with and be gone. Don't make a bloody mess of it.
Again IMO, it seems more likely that either the perp had a personal grudge against KC, or a grudge against women in general and KC happened to be around.
I can't see how it's possible to conclude the murderer was motivated by rage. IMO, that is pure projection: "I would only do that if I were in a rage". We don't know what the killer felt.IMO a contract killer would not kill with so much rage, or specifically target the groin area.
I don't think the idea of a contract killer is so unusual or strange or something that shouldn't be considered.
In many cases that is exactly what happened.
She'd recently told her husband she wanted a divorce and was making plans to move on with her life. That's a big motive right there.
The husband also publicly denied there was divorce talk (he stated that they had been merely going through a rough patch) and according to Karen's friend, Karen tried to divorce him, but he wasn't keen on that.She'd recently told her husband she wanted a divorce and was making plans to move on with her life. That's a big motive right there.
Way too many women have been murdered after attempting to leave their partner.
The husband also publicly denied there was divorce talk (he stated that they had been merely going through a rough patch) and according to Karen's friend, Karen tried to divorce him, but he wasn't keen on that.
I'm not sure what you are getting at. The husband willingly spoke with the British media and so did Karen's friend/neighbor (who is also British).Do you mean the guy didn't run to tabloids with a sob story
opening his heart to all and sundry?
Some men have dignity.
Personal problems are just that: PERSONAL.
Besides,
there are children to be thought of.
JMO
Yep,
but usually in gang related killings.
Here we have a lady living her best life in provincial France during retirement.
I cannot, for the life of me, imagine such extraordinary scenario.
My intuition fails in this specific regard
JMO
IF the husband is responsible, he thought smart. ML wouldn't have been a suspect then; only he himself as the husband, who exploited his wife's vacation in SA. MOOHmmm....
Sorry, but the husband is not on my list of hypothetical perps.
Besides,
If it was him (cough, cough)
he could do it while the victim was in S Africa.
There is a problem with violence there.
After all,
Karen left SA because of this issue.
And the attack could have been treated as random violence.
JMO
Perhaps the husband didn't even know M-L existed, let alone that she was his wife's love rival.IF the husband is responsible, he thought smart. ML wouldn't have been a suspect then; only he himself as the husband, who exploited his wife's vacation in SA. MOO