- Joined
- Jan 23, 2021
- Messages
- 17,084
- Reaction score
- 105,414
I think, being in a process of divorce isn't something, I have to lie about as a widower of a murdered woman. I wouldn't have to tell more details like having had fights about their possession or similar.RSBM
Re Karen's husband...
Why would the man bare his soul to tabloids??
Divorce & alleged "battles" are PRIVATE matters.
Matters between the spouses.
He described his late wife in beautiful words to the public,
as a proud and honourable man would.
"Never say bad things about the dead",
"never wash dirty linen in public"
- these are common in civilized societies.
After all,
they once had a good life together
and had children
who might read these words one day.
JMO
I think, being in a process of divorce isn't something, I have to lie about as a widower of a murdered woman. I wouldn't have to tell more details like having had fights about their possession or similar.
What, if AC had a connection to ML and used her for learning about Karen's village life? Maybe, she was willing to have him informed regularly? He could have known her from his last visit/vacation in France. MOO
Probably there would have been a language barrier between AC and ML. IIRC, at some point AC mentioned that he felt excluded from the village life that his wife enjoyed.I think, being in a process of divorce isn't something, I have to lie about as a widower of a murdered woman. I wouldn't have to tell more details like having had fights about their possession or similar.
What, if AC had a connection to ML and used her for learning about Karen's village life? Maybe, she was willing to have him informed regularly? He could have known her from his last visit/vacation in France. MOO
The new detail is that she got out of the car, closed the door and walked a few steps to her house.
The new detail is that she got out of the car, closed the door and walked a few steps to her house.
She put her key in the lock, opened the house door and switched on the interior lights before going back outside to fetch her dog - she had just opened the rear passenger door and that when she was attacked.
I've paraphrased/edited to avoid copyright issues.
Good point about them making sure it was her. I still think this was a hit, so that makes sense. I think the murderer left the country soon after. JMO.Hmmm...
So it seems IMO
that the murderer wanted to be SURE
that it was the OWNER who came by car.
It might mean it was a hit,
especially as the perp was probably someone outside the community.
And vanished into thin air.
Probably used theseen at the edge of the forest.
JMO
Yes, there is definitely no possibility of mistaken identity in this scenario.Hmmm...
So it seems IMO
that the murderer wanted to be SURE
that it was the OWNER who came by car.
It might mean it was a hit,
especially as the perp was probably someone outside the community.
And vanished into thin air.
Probably used theseen at the edge of the forest.
JMO
If the murderer didn't know the owner of the home without seeing the person going to the door and putting in their key, it might have been a hit man, who didn't know Karen - yes, you are right. Though the murderer wouldn't have known, whether Karen would come back to her car. Or did he fast enough notice the little dog on the back seat, assuming, that she HAD to return to the car immediately? Or did the murderer even know about her new little pet? Owner of the home= dark haired woman with little dog. Maybe, that were his instructions? Why didn't he know her car and license plate then for identifying Karen, when she appeared? He wouldn't have had to see, whether she would open the entrance door.Hmmm...
So it seems IMO
that the murderer wanted to be SURE
that it was the OWNER who came by car.
It might mean it was a hit,
especially as the perp was probably someone outside the community.
And vanished into thin air.
Probably used theseen at the edge of the forest.
JMO
Not wearing make-up on a planned event. that I find remarkable! I didn't know before.Another thing that caught my attention
was that friends said she looked tired and pale days before
and during the wine tasting event she didn't even wear make up which had been unheard of before.
(DM link above)
IMO
Karen was blackmailed by someone Business wise.
I guess this tragedy is money related.
Broken business.
"Business is business".
No sentiments.
![]()
If the murderer didn't know the owner of the home without seeing the person going to the door and putting in their key, it might have been a hit man, who didn't know Karen - yes, you are right. Though the murderer wouldn't have known, whether Karen would come back to her car. Or did he fast enough notice the little dog on the back seat, assuming, that she HAD to return to the car immediately? Or did the murderer even know about her new little pet? Owner of the home= dark haired woman with little dog. Maybe, that were his instructions? Why didn't he know her car and license plate then for identifying Karen, when she appeared? He wouldn't have had to see, whether she would open the entrance door.
My thoughts on this are probably not logical.
If the murderer didn't know the owner of the home without seeing the person going to the door and putting in their key, it might have been a hit man, who didn't know Karen - yes, you are right. Though the murderer wouldn't have known, whether Karen would come back to her car. Or did he fast enough notice the little dog on the back seat, assuming, that she HAD to return to the car immediately? Or did the murderer even know about her new little pet? Owner of the home= dark haired woman with little dog. Maybe, that were his instructions? Why didn't he know her car and license plate then for identifying Karen, when she appeared? He wouldn't have had to see, whether she would open the entrance door.
My thoughts on this are probably not logical.
Not wearing make-up on a planned event. that I find remarkable! I didn't know before.