That thing about the head being cut off because the killer/gun could potentially be identified if he had been shot in the head.. it totally doesn't make sense UNLESS it was the same gun that had *already* been implicated in a crime. ie they would have a bullet out of RD's head, which could then be compared with another bullet which had been used to kill someone previously. They would then be able to tell, same gun killed *this* person, so maybe same killer. Then after killing RD, presumably the killer would destroy or re-tool the gun so it could never be connected when used the next time.
So based on that theory, then can we potentially connect any possibilities? What about the gun that killed Mark? Was it ever retrieved by police? What about McIver (sp?) and the gun he used to kill his wife, were police able to retrieve that one? I suppose there could be many GA cases in which the gun was never confiscated by LE?? And I suppose it wouldn't necessarily have had to have been a GA case either.
So based on that theory, then can we potentially connect any possibilities? What about the gun that killed Mark? Was it ever retrieved by police? What about McIver (sp?) and the gun he used to kill his wife, were police able to retrieve that one? I suppose there could be many GA cases in which the gun was never confiscated by LE?? And I suppose it wouldn't necessarily have had to have been a GA case either.