Because we don’t know and it appears avoiding a public announcement is intentional, a snippet on the topic of beneficiaries of the trust. IIRC the children don’t live in NM.
Yet much like the media running with the Feb 11th date of death which clearly was not stated by the coroner, they seem to thrill at running stories about the children being written out of any inheritance.
BBM
A month after the couple died separately in their New Mexico home, an outside party has been appointed as the representative for their estates.
www.usatoday.com
Peters noted in a March 13 petition to the court that "there are trust assets to be administered in both the GeBe Revocable Trust and the Gene Hackman Living Trust," and that the GeBe trust "passes through the Will of Gene Hackman to the Gene Hackman Living Trust."
The latter "contains mainly out-of-state beneficiaries," per her court filing.
****
ETA It annoys me how the media often jumps to a conclusion to support the most scandalous probability of various options. < Click, click, click bait >
Given it was published that the son hired an estate lawyer, why is it automatically being assumed it’s because he intends on contesting Wills or Trust Directives? Maybe he was seeking legal advice to appropriately manage his inheritance?