The gag order is for attorneys and others directly related to the case, like investigators, including ATTORNEYS for victims' families. The text is clear on that point. It refers to attorneys for the families, not the families themselves. The families can speak out, just as we can or any other citizen. However, that is not to say that giving media interviews about the accused or the case itself is helpful to the cause of justice. Now that the is a suspect in jail, pending trial, there is no longer a risk of the case going cold or (if we think BK did the crime) the killer striking again. The gag order is NOT for S.G. or any parent.
I can't think of a case where people who are not on the investigative team added to the understanding of the case itself. As someone who watched whole weeks of the OJ trial while I was home writing a book, I know for sure that lawyers playing to the media can lose cases.
Parents and other family members can help us understand the impact of violent crime on families, the meaning of their loved ones' lives, the difficulty of going to trial, the pain of loss, and the broader impact on whole communities. They can keep us in touch with the cost of murder and help us see what we all have lost. These are all worthy ways for victims' families to have a voice. If S.G.'s attorney is leaking information or causing concerns about a fair trial, that should have been stopped before there was a gag order. Same with prosecutors, defense attorneys and investigators. I know I'm in the minority because I worry about the families pressuring the very people trying to bring about justice.
The Pike County massacre trial had a gag order too, and it was frustrating to those in the public who wanted to know everything right now and couldn't wait for a complex investigation to be completed and presented at trial. But once the trial begins, most if not all of the information will be public record, covered by the media, and presented to anyone who can get into the courtroom. The Pike County prosecutors got a LWOP conviction on 8 felony murder counts and other lesser charges without having the accused's DNA or fingerprints at the scene. If reports are right, this case is a far better one for the prosecution.