- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
- Messages
- 12,285
- Reaction score
- 161,599
What is the basis for the claim that KG's injuries were more severe than the others'?
This was what I thought. So, if someone is "ruled out" based on DNA, it simply means their DNA wasn't found among all the DNA in the house.From the News Nation little crime lab bit, they made it seem like there was a lot of DNA and trace evidence, but it would be figuring out who all has been in that house and when, that will be the issue. Since so many people have spent time there. I can imagine they are first detecting how many DNA profiles they have, then identifying them one by one, and using that a starting point for suspects.
There has to be much more to the stalker claim than this. People go out to meet other people all the time, and there is nothing unusual or stalker-ish about this scenario. The man didn’t make contact with K, whether he changed his mind, was too shy or intimidated or a million other reasons. It appears he followed a pretty girl into store. So?MOSCOW HOMICIDE UPDATE - DECEMBER 5, 2022
Part of the update:
"Using tips and leads, investigators have identified an incident involving Kaylee at a local business, which may have been the stalker reference she made to friends and family. In mid-October, two males were seen inside a local business; they parted ways, and one male appeared to follow Kaylee inside the business and as she exited to walk toward her car. The male turned away, and it did not appear he made any contact with her. Detectives contacted both males and learned the two were attempting to meet women at the business, this was corroborated through additional investigation. Based on available information, detectives believe this was an isolated incident and not an ongoing pattern of stalking. No evidence suggests the two males were involved in the murders. Investigators continue looking into information about Kaylee having a stalker. Information about a potential stalker or unusual occurrences should go through the Tip Line. "
That's as maybe, but that's your interpretation.Yes, it does make sense. If, for example, Kaylee was the primary victim and all the rest were collateral damage, it does pit the parents against each other. The other parents could say, what happened was due to YOUR child being targeted and my child would never have been killed if not for her. That is what he is saying. Then he went on to say that he told the other parents that should it turn out their child was the primary victim, he will not blame her or them for his daughter's death.
In regards to the reports of K’s injuries being more brutal than the others … if true, an explanation for this could simply be that she was stabbed first and the killer simply had an adrenaline surge during her stabbing then just …got tired. MOO I don’t believe that the extent of her injuries necessary mean she was the “target”
That's not exactly true. If they are requesting samples from anyone that fits a particular dynamic or circumstance, like neighbors, males between certain ages, heck they have asked entire towns to provide samples in Great Britain. I'm just saying that if you feel like you have legitimate probable cause against me, get a court order or go dig in my trash.Naturally, LE doesn't do this unless they have suspicions about a particular person.
Also from the release - DOG INFO
There have been numerous requests about the dog found at the residence on the
morning of November 13th. Arriving officers entered the residence and found the
deceased victims. During the search of the home, a dog was found in a room where the
crimes had not been committed. Officers did not find any evidence on the dog and there
was no indication the animal had entered the crime scene. The dog was taken to Animal
Services and released to a responsible person.
While the dog was in the house when officers arrived, it has not been determined where
the dog was physically located when the murders took place.
Maybe not necessary, but today’s release seems aimed at getting more tips, and trying to protect the two males from harassment. The dog comment may actuall
After reading the latest press release, I am going to say that LE is giving us way more information that Kaylee’s Dad is. For anyone criticizing him jeopardizing the investigation, I think some of the facts released today were not necessary for the public to hear.
4— it’s possible X&E were alone from 9-1:45.There’s a good amount of info in the release. My takeaways are as follows:
1-There are no named suspects or suspects in custody, but does not state there are no suspects or POIs.
2- The release did not clarify more than “male in grub truck surveillance video”. In light of interviews today, I am surprised at that unless there is a reason. Nor was anything updated/added to that video in the rumor section.
3- Dog was found in room where murders did not take place. That leaves the 1st floor, Ks room on the 3rd floor, and the room opposite Xs on the 2nd floor.
4- The still don’t have a ton of info about X&Es whereabouts - how is that even possible?
That's not exactly true. If they are requesting samples from anyone that fits a particular dynamic or circumstance, like neighbors, males between certain ages, heck they have asked entire towns to provide samples in Great Britain. I'm just saying that if you feel like you have legitimate probable cause against me, get a court order or go dig in my trash.
I ain't volunteering mine.
What is the basis for the claim that KG's injuries were more severe than the others'?