IMO The LE citations?Neighbors have killed over less. IMO. Which is one reason why it's so hard to get a grasp on this case - we could probably list 20-30 possible motives.
IMO The LE citations?Neighbors have killed over less. IMO. Which is one reason why it's so hard to get a grasp on this case - we could probably list 20-30 possible motives.
I highly doubt it. Why wouldn't LE would want the public to know that information?Correct me if I'm wrong but I didn't hear him say the quote you are referring to above. I did hear him say around the 4:03 mark in the video "We're not sure exactly where the individual is". I feel that this means they possibly know who they are but just not where.
JMO
And what about seat fibers? the reason I ask is because in the PNW it tends to get a little snowy/muddy/wet, and 11-12 yo car mats might be replaced IMO. So if the car was older or newer, the mats might not be original ones. JMO and spitballing here.
There is even the possibility that the plan was to go talk to someone, not to kill, and it spiraled out of control.
But I don't think this was hate in the killers mind, per se. I think it is justified in the killers mind as the victims deserved it. For whatever warped reason and it could be envy or jealousy and that does not have to equal hate.
How many 2011-2013 Elantras have been sold and re-sold? Almost seems irresponsible to put this description out there. If I had one, I would be paranoid.As someone who works for a large, successful, high volume USED dealership the last 6 years and knows Hyundai Elantras better than the average human being (I am not bragging, trust me) - I would be happy to help explain to you why the reasoning is considered more than reasonable.
If you are releasing information to the general public, regarding 3 different years that the Hyundai Elantra could possibly be AND asking for their help - it screamed to me that even LE doesn’t know what they are looking at. If they are confident it’s a Hyundai, great. Calling it an Elantra ranging several years - crap confidence level.
How would people help LE by looking at a white Elantra and thinking “that’s got to be a 2011-2013.” Or “let me ask this random guy who could possibly be a murderer what year his car is and see if I got a winner!”
THE ONLY WAY THE GENERAL PUBLIC COULD POSSIBLY HELP IDENTIFY THE VEHICLE YEAR IS BY RUNNING UP TO THE CAR PHYSICALLY AND SCANNING THE VIN ON THE WINDSHIELD.
This vehicle image that is circulating doesn’t show a sharp image of it being a Hyundai does it? Let’s give LE benefit of the doubt quick because I’m not trying to NOT trust them or say to not trust them. Let’s say it’s a Hyundai for sure (I can list atleast 3 other manufacture names, models and trims that I thought of while looking at the image of the vehicle for what it’s worth) . Go look up a 2019 Hyundai ioniq. It’s just so vague and dangerous to have ranging years when lots of people will assume the year of an Elantra and think it’s a 2011-2013 because they don’t know cars well enough. It’s irresponsible.
If this was the case, wouldn’t they be appealing to the public to help find him?Ok.IMO this indicates the LE has someone in mind, but really don’t know where the person is. Take this at face value. I think they know who did it, but can’t locate.
IMO, not if he got rid of the vehicle.I believe there have to be databases for seat fibers as well. I too am just spitballing - but it did occur to me that there was a reason, based on evidence found in the actual crime scene (specifically, in the intimate zone of the victims).
Even if the car is never found, such data could link a particular person to the crime if they were observed driving or in possession of an Elantra. At any rate, LE would have an obligation to try and find that car.
I just keep thinking that they have more than a vague idea why they want the Elantra. And, not coincidentally, the perp knows that he's now associated with an Elantra. That's gotta be concerning to him.
IMO I think the motive is someone not being included, someone who wanted desperately to be part of the group. I will be shocked if it's something other than this only because it seems like most killings these days involve something along these lines. Or bullying.
I held the same opinion of the video footage before the interview was released. I think it's irresponsible to speculate about potential motives of specific individuals based on a seconds-long clip of a conversation between two victims. There's no way to ever know the meaning of that conversation because both K and M are dead.I don't think that interview means anything at all.
Just because they didn't continue the conversation in front of a driver and acted happy doesn't mean the prior conversation wasn't serious.
I certainly wouldn't dismiss as a nothing burger based on a guy who claims he drove them a lot in an interview in the Daily Mirror.... 4 weeks later.
I think this person is on the run and they don't want them to be alarmed. Maybe they want the person to relax thinking they're not onto them so they may come back to the area. JMOIf this was the case, wouldn’t they be appealing to the public to help find him?
Yea, Ive been thinking he and the vehicle are MIA. I suppose it may not have stood out since everyone took off after the murders, then Thanksgiving and now with Christmas. Going through the remote learners, if a student will help, but if not a student, that’s going to be tough.Ok.IMO this indicates the LE has someone in mind, but really don’t know where the person is. Take this at face value. I think they know who did it, but can’t locate.
I do agree with this; that it's probably about something silly. Still, what if "everything" is a big somethingburger and they knew better than to talk about it in front of the driver? So they talk about their pasta.According to the individual who drove M and K home that night, they talked about food. I see the exchange captured on video as a nothingburger and a distraction, because it's devoid of the context that would be required to understand its meaning.
Driver who dropped off Idaho students at murder house breaks silence
IMO the Adam conversation is actually fortunate, because Adam is known, not a mystery, and he has been interviewed by the police.Much has been speculated about the meaning of the conversation between Kaylee and Maddie ....The I told Adam Everything conversation.
One theory that Maddie told Adam that Kaylee was done with her relationship with Jack D. and Adam, both a friend and roommate or former roommate of Jack's, passed on that information.
That doesn't make sense to me. That would be breaking girl code to interfere in a relationship like that without permission. Kaylee's tone sounds like she's not thrilled when she's heard about it.
What makes more sense to me is if Maddie told Adam Kaylee was scared of someone and gave examples of things the person had been doing, stalking ect.
That Maddie was taking it seriously and Kaylee wasn't or wasn't ready to confront the situation yet....and Maddie decided to act.
The fact that Adam was a bartender opens up his view of their social interactions . Maddie might have chosen him because the person was known to frequent the bar in addition to his relationship with Kaylee's ex.
Same here. When I watched the video, I was stunned to see that a party was going on and no residents were even home. Seems dangerous. And I can't help but think about the poor dog being there in all of that ruckus and commotion. I wonder how many times police had been called to the house.I just have no understanding of greek life, or college party life, so I would be 100% guessing. I'm 60 and I was floored that there was a party going on when none of the residents was even there, and another poster thought it was hilarious that anyone even thought that was strange. Clearly, I am not the right demographic to draw conclusions on that situation. LOL
I will say that anywhere you have a mix of people and personalities, I think there is the potential for a conflict serious enough to end in murder. I would be shocked to learn that it was someone from the neighborhood pissed off about the parties. I would have expected more escalation between calling the police to complain about noise and murder. Maybe there has been more escalation and we just don't know it. But I would also think calling the police repeatedly about the noise and then killing them is a great way to make yourself an early suspect.
At least there was in Canada:To my knowledge, there was never an APB or a BOLO for this vehicle.
IMO the car is likely in a garage or under a tarp.
He was enraged by being spurned as psychopaths imagine a relationship that does not exists and rage when spurned as asking to be boyfriend or go on date etc., or could be jealous.
They have found people on good old Forensic Files matching old van carpeting with their data base of carpet etc. So they have resources, so I would think it could be done, as well as contacting Hyundai no?I believe there have to be databases for seat fibers as well. I too am just spitballing - but it did occur to me that there was a reason, based on evidence found in the actual crime scene (specifically, in the intimate zone of the victims).
Even if the car is never found, such data could link a particular person to the crime if they were observed driving or in possession of an Elantra. At any rate, LE would have an obligation to try and find that car.
I just keep thinking that they have more than a vague idea why they want the Elantra. And, not coincidentally, the perp knows that he's now associated with an Elantra. That's gotta be concerning to him.
Thanks for sharing! That was beautiful and sad at the same time.IMO
IMO, he will suffer with guilt for a long time, but it isn’t necessary. He didn’t do anythining
People did photo the vin on the car in Oregon, contacted and threatened the owner. That owner has a lawsuit IMO. Many photos of people's Hyundai's parked in their driveways or on the street, some including license plate numbers.As someone who works for a large, successful, high volume USED dealership the last 6 years and knows Hyundai Elantras better than the average human being (I am not bragging, trust me) - I would be happy to help explain to you why the reasoning is considered more than reasonable.
If you are releasing information to the general public, regarding 3 different years that the Hyundai Elantra could possibly be AND asking for their help - it screamed to me that even LE doesn’t know what they are looking at. If they are confident it’s a Hyundai, great. Calling it an Elantra ranging several years - crap confidence level.
How would people help LE by looking at a white Elantra and thinking “that’s got to be a 2011-2013.” Or “let me ask this random guy who could possibly be a murderer what year his car is and see if I got a winner!”
THE ONLY WAY THE GENERAL PUBLIC COULD POSSIBLY HELP IDENTIFY THE VEHICLE YEAR IS BY RUNNING UP TO THE CAR PHYSICALLY AND SCANNING THE VIN ON THE WINDSHIELD.
This vehicle image that is circulating doesn’t show a sharp image of it being a Hyundai does it? Let’s give LE benefit of the doubt quick because I’m not trying to NOT trust them or say to not trust them. Let’s say it’s a Hyundai for sure (I can list atleast 3 other manufacture names, models and trims that I thought of while looking at the image of the vehicle for what it’s worth) . Go look up a 2019 Hyundai ioniq. It’s just so vague and dangerous to have ranging years when lots of people will assume the year of an Elantra and think it’s a 2011-2013 because they don’t know cars well enough. It’s irresponsible.