tresir2012
Former Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2019
- Messages
- 11,156
- Reaction score
- 58,559
Deleted dupe.
Last edited:
I thought a client has to be honest and tell everything to their lawyer or they cannot properly defend them. If she doesn't explain where the kids are, they are at a big disadvantage right from the beginning. If she says I am not saying anything about the kids I don't see how they can do their job. MOO.Nor would they ask. Their job is to defend the client, not solve crimes.
Even people like LV merit a vigorous defense. It should be an interesting trial.
He tried to figure out if the bond proceeding counted as a “contested proceeding” under Idaho law...He did a lot of research but couldn’t come up with any crystal clear answer. So he decided to “err on the side of caution” and just grant the motion to disqualify without cause.
Attorneys Webb and Elcox are from the same firm, aren't they? It sounds more like that firm is no longer representing her.
...the only one who got the impression that Webb and Elcox had differences of opinions with Means?...
Nor would they ask. Their job is to defend the client, not solve crimes....Even people like LV merit a vigorous defense. It should be an interesting trial.
...I thought a client has to be honest and tell everything to their lawyer or they cannot properly defend them...
Thank you.
And is there any time limit of asking for bail reduction? For example, if more information comes to light before May, from outside the courtroom, can the court increase the bail? Or if something comes to light in Lori's best interests, can she again try to force a reduction?A change of judge normally means LESS of a chance of getting any decision reconsidered—judges are very reluctant to second-guess what another judge has decided in the case.
That said, I’m sure she can ask for reduced bail anytime she says there’s been a change in the relevant circumstances.
Nope. Lawyer can't lie in court, so lawyers don't necessarily want to know the truth.I thought a client has to be honest and tell everything to their lawyer or they cannot properly defend them. If she doesn't explain where the kids are, they are at a big disadvantage right from the beginning. If she says I am not saying anything about the kids I don't see how they can do their job. MOO.
mapsI've been busy fending off the coronavirus horde, what's this about a Dear Chad letter? Mine? Is someone posting it out there on FB?
ABSOLUTELY!! Spot on @Picklepuck , that's the answer! The tire was placed into the unit on Oct 2 AFTER the shooting.
9:14 shooting happens followed by the chase down E Pecos Rd. until BB gets away. Shooter calls, "Hey! You've got to get the tire and seat out of my townhome NOW! I think he saw me and will track down my current address. LE will investigate and find the tire and seat. I'm busted!" Lori panics because she can't move the items by herself. Who does she know who can help, either without asking questions or by keeping confidence? ---> Chad Daybell. They do this a few hours later. Then shooter returns to Rexburg to replace the tire and seat, thinking if he gets questioned, here's the vehicle with the seat and tire, "wasn't me!"
I go back and forth with possibilities... But I am sure the best person to know his exact gym schedule is MBP. And if they had succeeded perhaps part of the plan was to take the four kids back with them. Does anyone know where the kids were at this point. Clearly if BB was at the gym...someone had to be watching them. Surprised we haven't heard more about this.Thanks, I think who was in the jeep at that time is key to the case, because they were ALL part of a conspiracy to commit murder.
He isn't exactly the type who probably wants the media attention of having every single action he does scrutinized by media, LEO. If this goes to trial, it is going to be a circus.
I would take a pass on it too.
I feel it was a smooth move. No time to be wasted on whether/whether not he is biased because of the custody case. And given that he was probably heavily invested in having to learn a lot for the custody case--I would feel he IS personally biased, and would rather spend his time with Larry and Kay than Lori and Chad.I've actually never seen a judge that wimpy in my entire life, and I've got quite a bit of miles behind me.
I thought a client has to be honest and tell everything to their lawyer or they cannot properly defend them. If she doesn't explain where the kids are, they are at a big disadvantage right from the beginning. If she says I am not saying anything about the kids I don't see how they can do their job. MOO.
I thought he had just handed them over to her before he went to the gym, but I will need to check on that.I go back and forth with possibilities... But I am sure the best person to know his exact gym schedule is MBP. And if they had succeeded perhaps part of the plan was to take the four kids back with them. Does anyone know where the kids were at this point. Clearly if BB was at the gym...someone had to be watching them. Surprised we haven't heard more about this.
i think we are ALL hungry to talk about which meds or which poisons!!!! I, for one, think this lone bottle of Risperidone has nothing to do with the deaths... it is just one single med that was "hangin around". But I know others here have had other thoughts. Alex hauling hazardous waste, and some others in their wider circle helped with the recipe used. Once they announce what was in Alex's body we all get to go crazy with sleuthing!!!!!!!!!!Effects of risperidone in overdose.
Acri AA1, Henretig FM.
Author information
Abstract
This study was a 13-month prospective, descriptive case series of risperidone overdose reported by telephone to a regional poison control center (PCC) serving Philadelphia, PA. Patients were seen in local Philadelphia-area emergency departments. The variables examined were medical history, therapeutic use of risperidone, time postingestion, reported coingestants, clinical findings, decontamination and treatment, electrocardiograph results, laboratory data, standard toxicologic screen results, and length of time in hospital. Thirty-one patients (29 adult/adolescent, 2 pediatric) with reported risperidone overdose were identified. Risperidone was the sole ingestant in 15 cases (1 mg to 180 mg). The major observed effects in this group included lethargy (7), spasm/dystonia (3), hypotension (2), tachycardia (6), and dysrhythmia (1). Sixteen cases involved coingestants, including benzodiazepines, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, ethanol, tricyclic antidepressants, lithium, anticonvulsants, diphenhydramine, ibuprofen, and anticholinergic agents. Major effects in these patients included lethargy (10), coma (1), seizure (1), tachycardia (7), bradycardia (1), hypotension (4), and a syndrome of muscle spasms, diaphoresis, and fever. Treatment provided for patients in this study included antiarrhythmics (1), diphenhydramine (2), anticonvulsant (1), vasopressor agent (1), endotracheal intubation/assisted ventilation (5), and supportive care. One patient who coingested imipramine died of medical complications. In the remaining patients, symptoms resolved with 24 hours in the majority, with all patients asymptomatic at 72 hours postingestion. These data show that risperidone toxicity manifests primarily as mild central nervous system effects and reversible neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects.
Makes me wonder about JJ's risperidone meds.
I hope you're right the state don't have to do much to prove the lack of support. Just wondering why both sides need another two months before the next court appearance? Perhaps they think more charges may be coming, as we do.Casey Anthony. Once she was at trial, she did not say a word. Jose Baez crafted a narrative, that unless the jury knew 100% that CA was guilty, they couldn't convict.
Now, that isn't true. People are allowed to make inferences. INMO, if it had not been a death penalty case, CA would be in prison today.
In this case, the state doesn't have to do much, to prove that LV doesn't support her kids, and abandoned them. In order to refute this, LV would have to testify, which opens up a Pandora's box. She thought that she was so clever. No body, no evidence. Amd she could flip everything on to AC. Now, she can't.
I agree so much. We are going to be so into watching her body language with a female judge!Ideally a good judge will be gender-blind and Male or Female won’t make a bit of difference. But if there are gender dynamics at play here, I’m glad the judge is female. If for no other reason than Lori would probably prefer a male. Plus IMO females aren’t just less likely to be swayed by a hair flip or two, they’re more likely to find it annoying.
Of course I don't know their ages but presumably some of them were old enough to be in school.I go back and forth with possibilities... But I am sure the best person to know his exact gym schedule is MBP. And if they had succeeded perhaps part of the plan was to take the four kids back with them. Does anyone know where the kids were at this point. Clearly if BB was at the gym...someone had to be watching them. Surprised we haven't heard more about this.
There was a poster on an earlier thread who owns one and they said the tailgate would have to be opened first to open the rear window.Do we have any more pictures of the Jeep? I only found one. I found a photo of the same model as CVs Jeep and assume this is the factory hard top and back door configuration.
I have a couple of questions re: the more-than-one-person-in-the-vehicle scenario.
1) Does the back window of CVs Jeep look the same as red one? Does it have those clips? Hard to tell from the photo.
2) Does anyone familiar with new Jeep hardtops know if the window can be tilted outward if the tire is off?
I am just curious where a hypothetical person #2 would be located, if you could actually shoot out of the back window without opening the back hatch.
Apologies if this has been discussed ad nauseam - I am having a hard time keeping up because... life.![]()
I thought a client has to be honest and tell everything to their lawyer or they cannot properly defend them. If she doesn't explain where the kids are, they are at a big disadvantage right from the beginning. If she says I am not saying anything about the kids I don't see how they can do their job. MOO.
I can't begin to figure out why one might have been in favor and the other not. Is it clear to anyone else?It sounded like the disagreement was over the waiver Lori signed where she waived the 14-day requirement for a pre-trial hearing.
Webb was quite clear that he and Means would not be able to come to an agreement on that.
Means was also very clear that the client wanted to sign the waiver.
I agree so much. We are going to be so into watching her body language with a female judge!Ideally a good judge will be gender-blind and Male or Female won’t make a bit of difference. But if there are gender dynamics at play here, I’m glad the judge is female. If for no other reason than Lori would probably prefer a male. Plus IMO females aren’t just less likely to be swayed by a hair flip or two, they’re more likely to find it annoying.
Thank for the calendar.. looks like Oct 2 was nothing special. Are we certain, if her kids were school age, that they were in Gilbert public schools?Of course I don't know their ages but presumably some of them were old enough to be in school.
This calendar for Gilbert Public Schools might or might not be of relevance, depending on where they were at. https://www.gilbertschools.net/site/handlers/filedownload.ashx?moduleinstanceid=72&dataid=7&FileName=2019-2020 School Calendar.pdf
No it's not clear to me. I can understand how it might benefit the prosecutor if there are going to be additional charges but I don't see why defense should want to cooperate with or assist the state. It kind of makes more sense to me to try to push the state to prove at the soonest opportunity what they have, or release the defendant. Unless he knows already it is a given that the state has enough evidence - then the extra time gives him time to read his law books.I can't begin to figure out why one might have been in favor and the other not. Is it clear to anyone else?