To me, in my opinion, cutting through all the inflammatory, rabble-rousing, prejudicial language that RA’s attorneys put into the motion, this is what they were saying…
”Judge,
Please move our client RA closer to our office because it will make our jobs easier.
Like many people he has not adjusted well to being incarcerated and has declined physically and mentally. We know because we have sat on our rears for the last five months watching this happen, but have said nothing until today, after we realized we could spin this in a way it might influence potential jurors. We are not asking for an immediate mental evaluation, even though he needs it.
This man is being kept in solitary confinement as it has been decided he needs to be in protective custody. How dare the authorities try to keep him safe.
Our client has not been visited by family or friends despite the fact that they could come if they wanted to. This is an outrage, somehow, as his family should not be given the free will to choose in this matter. RA’s inability or lack of desire to visit with them virtually must be addressed immediately.
We dropped a boatload of papers off for him but they haven’t been given to him by authorities. We could have walked into the prison personally, sat down, discussed them with him, gone over a few with him, looked in his eyes, had a heart to heart, but it just wasn’t convenient…for us.
A reminder, Judge, this is an emergency. So take a few days to think about it, and you can reach us out by the pool, next the MaiTai Hut.”