Once again, Good post!
I can really feel you as you're trying to think this through... rsbbm
This is what makes his actions so very strange. He is so casual. Yet people say holding their phone over the rail takes their breath away. They say not to put babies on the countertop or edge of the bed so they don’t fall. So did he actually believe the window was th
That was what was so striking right?
It took my breath away just watching from here!
I just can't see it, unless he thought there was solid glass there. And even then, that's awfully casual... but that would be the only I could even kinda, sorta see being so nonchalant.
I mean I have held my babies up to windows, but you better believe I was absolutely certain that they were, in fact,
there and sound! By
actually touching them, even if I could plainly see our reflection!
That was the thing, that did give me a moments pause, about if he really might have thought the window was closed.
But that's not what he told PR authorities on the scene! I find that little factoid hard to get past!
Why not? Winkleman (and, to fair Chloe's parents), claim SA has repeatedly said he thought there was glass there, but not a single early report, nor anyone
not involved in the legal matters, has reported that.
You would think PR officials would have seriously questioned that part of his account, as we all are...
Yet none of them even mention a "mistake" of any kind. They flat out quote him as having told officers he had her looking out the window and he dropped her.
That even feels like the truth, when you look at the footage. Doesn't seem like he was trying to tap any glass, at any time, so why not? Why not get closer to the bottom windows, ya know, the ones that actually
were closed?
It will be interesting to see if anyone else aboard testifies to what he said.
I didn't like the way Winkleman stated that "no one could disprove SAs account because no witness have come forward".
That's not the same as saying SA's account is the truth.