JB was also training a dog for tracking scents. Would burning clothes be as a counter to knowing what dogs could do.
My question is..would JB have killed Lisa or did he kidnap her so SB could have her...I am stuck to on why he would this
I am having a hard time assigning a motive to JB. So he's mad or sad about the breakdown of his marriage. How is kidnapping a neighbor's baby going to help him?
I'm told JB's text was to say that he loved her. She waited an hour, I'm told, before responding back in the same manner.
Maybe I am off here...but if JB kidnapped Lisa for SB and they moved to the house he wanted to buy her..SB would have to drop DB completely and never ever invite her over to her new house or even give her the new address as Lisa would be there...Now if JB bought the house out of state-that would have been better..but I assume this house was in the area..
I'm back and forth at the computer with other work and testing a new chili dog recipe.Feel free to check Missouri court records at http://www.court.mo.gov/casenet
I am having a hard time assigning a motive to JB. So he's mad or sad about the breakdown of his marriage. How is kidnapping a neighbor's baby going to help him?
Revenge is a very common motive, just sayin'
Revenge is a very common motive, just sayin'
More info about the text:
Brando's husband told CNN that he spent the night of Oct. 3 with a friend. He showed CNN texts between him and his wife on Oct. 3. At 10:33 p.m., the neighbor wrote to Brando that he loved her and their daughter and to kiss her goodnight. Brando responded at 10:54 p.m. that she and their daughter loved him too.
The man told CNN that he went to bed. He got up about 5 a.m. to go to his job at the Whiteman Air Force Base. The man said he received a call from Brando at 5:59 a.m. Oct. 4 to alert him that Lisa was missing.
http://www.kctv5.com/story/15953146/neighbor-says
The kiss shouldn't have raised a flag to me but it did because of the time he made the text and the request to kiss his daughter goodnight.
No offense. But please scroll back. Something I believe covered yesterday. It will make all of this easier to follow.
I'm covering a lot of this too at http://www.facebook.com/kansascitypi
Revenge is a very common motive, just sayin'
I can say that this was a case of information coming from Spellman to a producer to a reporter and that things got lost in translation. Upsetting.
Steve Young has confirmed that police have moved on from both Tanko and Brando but have not "cleared" anyone.
And while Mr. Rugen may have made certain facts publicly known now, they have been known by the media and the police and neighborhood residents for four months. That's why Mr. Brando was scrutinized and asked to take a lie detector test.
What we don't know is was the four-year-old child sleeping in her home while the two women were on the stoop or was she crashed on the couch with the Irwin-Bradley boys (hypotethitcally speaking but that's my personal guess as to what happened).
I understand that these are new facts here and WSers will want to hang onto them. I realize Gil and now Mr. Rugen have insinuated that James Brando had motive and reason but KCPD has looked into them. I'll let you debate whether that review was sufficient or not. But police were clear....they moved on from James Brando. They have not moved on from Debbie Bradley.
And Mr. Brando is living back in his residence on Lister according to casenet records.
Revenge for what? What did Lisa ever do to him?