Let's just hope they're focusing in the right direction.
Let's just hope they're focusing in the right direction.
Yes. I hope this search is based on something more concrete than whatever "tip" made them search DeDe's place of employment...
Wasn't DD's place of employment searched because her employer informed LE that she couldn't find DD for a protracted length of time?
I won't go into my speculation of why this accusation ever occurred, as it would be off-topic--but, back to the point I was making, absolutely nothing came of the search at DeDe's place of employment and I hope that something comes of this search.
We have no idea if anything came from that search. This is not Florida. LE doesn't have to tell us what they find.
I respectfully disagree. We do have an idea that nothing came from that search, as they are searching a completely different area now.
Well if you mean find Kyron's body, then no. It appears that did not happen. However, that does NOT mean NOTHING came from the search. They could have found other clues. We just don't know.
We can disagree. I feel confident that if anything came out of the search of DeDe's place of employment, we would have heard something--it wouldn't have to come from LE, obviously...
When asked whether people would be shocked when this case comes to its conclusion Staton said, I think that there will be things that come out of this investigation that will surprise you. That youll think about later on after its over. These are things I will tell you, when you ask me about the stresses that my staff is under and the other detectives and agency representatives are under, is that we have a knowledge of things that we dont want to know about. ... "We have knowledge of things we wished we didn't."
http://www.katu.com/news/local/103005759.html
IMO, this quote should be a permanent fixture for anyone who has been following Kyron's disappearance closely. It should be the context for which you base anything that comes afterward.
BBM
Why? There's no context for his statements. They're vaguely insidious.
Vaguely insidious? Could you explain what you mean by that? I don't see anything insidious about his statements.
I agree that these were unusual statements and I hope that once brought into context they will make sense;not only as to what they mean but why he said them at that time.Sure, I will explain. LE and others throw out vague comments meant to rile the masses and support their POV, but they don't back it up with evidence. IMHO, they need to put up or shut up. Either arrest Terri, bring Terri's ham sandwich before the grand jury and indict it, provide evidence for statements, or stop with vague and meaningless comments. The innuendo and salacious inferences aren't helping find Kyron. It can't be about Kyron if so many people are making about everything but him.
Sure, I will explain. LE and others throw out vague comments meant to rile the masses and support their POV, but they don't back it up with evidence. IMHO, they need to put up or shut up. Either arrest Terri, bring Terri's ham sandwich before the grand jury and indict it, provide evidence for statements, or stop with vague and meaningless comments. The innuendo and salacious inferences aren't helping find Kyron. It can't be about Kyron if so many people are making about everything but him.
To be fair to LE, they have no obligation to the "viewing public" to "put up" until they have the strongest case possible.
If they "shut up" which has mostly been the case... the public leaps to the assumption that there is no case and millions have been wasted.
On the other hand, if they "put up" a few comments that show the case is progressing, LE is criticized that these statements are not as complete as the public's instant gratification standards would like. It makes sense that their comments are "vague" because the first priority is protecting the integrity of the case, as it should be.
I don't understand how LE comments can be BOTH "vague" and "meaningless"....AND also meet the definition of "salacious."
I have seen no deliberate attempt by LE to "rile the masses." I'd appreciate some examples of that so I might better understand. How do "vague" and "meaningless" comments.... "rile the masses?" I might respectfully suggest we are too easily "riled" if that was actually the case.
And IMO, THE most "salacious aspect" of this case..the Murder for Hire plot...came not from the mouths of LE to the public...but through court documents filed by the victim-to-be.
If LE found the witness claiming Murder for Hire by Terri...they had an obligation to tell Kaine. Kaine was certainly within his rights to take Baby K, get a RO, and file for divorce...all "public" events. Should a man have to live with a woman he believes tried to have him killed...to protect her reputation from these "salacious" revelations during a missing person's investigation? I think that's asking a lot.
We have heard wise words from Kyron's loving Dad this week..."be patient." The hammer will fall when LE is ready.
"Put up or shut up" only serves the demands of the curious general public. But, it is not the general public who comes FIRST...who needs to have it's desire for details satiated. The integrity of the case comes first. It is Kyron that needs to be afforded justice...for whatever that little guy endured.