Does anyone know if there are limitations as to how long Jean can have for his cross? Can he drag it out for several days?
None that I am aware of, but if he strays from what was testified to or repeats questions, they will stop that.
I think the potential for danger here, in this case, arises when we equate Jodi to a mentally healthy woman. It is extremely likely to me that she did use sex as a means of control and manipulation. That isn't a gender slam, fwiw, but a common tool of a disordered personality.
Likewise, my ex, also disordered, begged me to have sex with him on our first date but would also often withhold it as means of punishment further into our relationship. For disordereds it is as much a game for their amusement as a means to control or subjugate another human being.
So no, I don't believe Jodi is a




but I do most certainly believe she is a depraved, soulless anomaly I fortunately cannot relate to on even the most basic of human levels - much less gender.
Bravo. Beautiful post.
If she were not a conniving psychopath, I'd just call her a bit wild. Fine by me! People who wait for marriage are fine by me, too.
Sex is so individual, I think. I do hate it when folks decide what is 'whorish' based on a woman's enjoyment of sex, etc, because we don't all have to agree about something so personal! But in this case, I think it's clear that Jodi used the sex for devious purposes.
I don't think she even likes sex, myself. But she'll use it incessantly, and that's where I think she's foul.
I think Travis may well have been having a great sexual time, but I do believe it also bothered his conscience at other times. He was a big boy, so that's all his choice. But I definitely think she tried her best to seduce him.
Precisely. Especially the BBM parts.
Caller on JVM finds Jodi is keeping her on the edge of her seat. Says Jodi is likable! Thinks Prosecution better be careful and not too aggressive because Jodi is going to give him a run for his money.
Whoa, my take is totally different.
Not only is she as shallow as a puddle, she's has no depth in feelings leading up to the loves of her life. She has clearly remarked several times that she knew these relationships were leading no where or she didn't have high expectations. It was purely a gamble to see if she could get any thing from them, hey yeah, maybe even get married if anyone ever asked. Travis lost his entire wonderful life because of her. I find her very unlikeable and so shallow it wouldn't bother me if she got DP.
This is what worries me. That caller is not unique. And that's a problem. Most of the posters on here are immersed in this case and have been. The jurors have never heard of this case before now, at least not in depth.
Okay, I'm posting this pic, but I had to take a pic of my screen, can't figure out how to take a screenshot of my phone (it's a windows phone). It's not the best photo, but this is when JA dropped her "bombshell" and the court reporter is deciding if it's too late to start a new career...
:floorlaugh:
At least he can go home and vent, unlike the jurors! (If his spouse will let him, that is).
I will still contend that Lisa put it out there because at some point his behavior made her feel "dirty" and uncomfortable.
Remember she sent the email while Travis was alive and as we know, people tend to soften their views on the transgressions of others after those transgressors have died.
There was obviously something there that upset her and God forbid some young man make MY daughter feel that way and she is then pressured into recanting, saying she was just being "immature".
I want her to follow her instincts and not let some backwards thinking mentality impress upon her that she "misremembered" things and that she never actually felt groped or pressured.
Women in general do not tend to follow the pattern of speaking well of exes, even if they died unless they died while they were still together. But, nothing in her e-mail showed she was pressured to have sex or that Travis tried to get her to have sex. And to me, that's the definition of "coming on strong".
I do not believe Lisa was a liar when she testified,. She seemed very insistent on clearing things up and her testimony indicated Travid was not abusive or pressured her sexually:
From your post:
Q: Did Travis ever call you names?
A: No
Q: Did you personally feel threatened by Travis
A: No
Q: Was Travis ever abusive to you?
A: No
Q: Did he ask you to have sex with him?
A: No
Q: Did you feel pressured to do anything?
A: No
Q: Did Travis ever make sexual advances to you, while you were dating?
A: No, just all it was was making out
Thank you. I am very sad about woman an deceiver and temptress.
I remember a few years ago, and not that many, a man was defending the sex abuse of a child because she was doing all kinds of sexual maneuvers.
The judge bought it. The girl was five years old. Yes, right here in the USA.
It is such a pervasive attitude that whole countries have women in the chador so they do not tempt men.
Think of all of the negative connotations of " single mother."
Is there a female equivalent on regular TV to Two and One Half Men?
I wonder how a female Charlie Sheen show would go over?
I agree with you but that is NOT what is going on here. This is not about jodi's gender or gender bashing or




shaming. Once again: THE PEOPLE BRINGING UP SEX IN THIS CASE, OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN, ARE THE DEFENSE - JODI AND HER TEAM, NO ONE ELSE.
You just don't get to brutally murder an innocent guy who, it is clear from testimony, evidence and your past conduct, you used sex to dominate, and then cry rape or sex abuse or abuse, period.
And I think it is disingenuous and frankly, baffling that the subjugation of women would be used to explain or defend a violent murderer.
Gender bias goes both ways, friends. Travis was found naked, unarmed and piteously slaughtered in a shower stall, moments after his sexual partner was snapping repeated photos of his naked body. Yet it is inferred that jodi may have been the victim in some way, that Travis must have been aggressive in some way, probably sexually and that jodi, as a woman, could not have used sex to manipulate or control him. Why?
Women can commit domestic violence and sexual violence. And let me tell you, we would not hesitate to assume that Travis sexually dominated jodi if she was the one found naked and unarmed and very murdered, in her shower and if Travis was the one on trial. So the only reason it doesn't work the other way is due to a unfair gender bias, IMO, just not the one some are alleging.