From your post:
Sorry Gitana but I am on my iPad and the screen is small, so I lose long posts.
I am not explaining this well at all, I know, because people go off on tangents,
I do not care about the sex the defense is bringing up. I am not referring to the sex in this trial.
What I am concerned about it that JA is called a 


, etc,
Men who do the identical behavior are not looked at as





.
Was Ted Bundy so seductive that he was able to attract women? Was he a




?
That is not even a conversation about Ted Bundy because he is a murderer.
JA is a murderer. If she had a new BF everyday of the week, it does not matter because she is a murderer. It does not matter if she wore a topless outfit. She is a murderer.
TA does not have to be a naive virgin 30 year old male to be a murder victim.
TA could have a new GF everyday. That does not mean that he cannot be a murder victim.