Good morning fellow sleuthers! I am just now getting here, I stayed up late (for me) to read Katiecoo's observations from inside the courtroom. I can't wait to read Anita Richman's insights too! Very exciting and insightful.
I want to share what I woke up thinking this morning. My wheels were turning all day processing Juan's cross examination of Jodi. I had to keep reminding myself that this was only cross of Jodi's testimony and NOT rebuttal.
In retrospect there are two distinct points Juan is trying to prove (now and much more during rebuttal when he can bring in witness testimony): 1) That this 3rd and final story of Jodi's is just that- a story, not unlike the other two. The only difference being she admitted that she in fact murdered Travis. First story I was NOT there... nowhere near Travis or Arizona for MONTHS prior-I had NOTHING to do with his murder. Second story, told only because there was irrefutable evidence, that she was there, ok, yes I was there that day but two OTHER people came in and killed Travis. Third and final story, I was there AND I killed him but in self defense of a dropped camera (how ridiculous- I mean really- what did you all think when you heard that reason), but now here are all the new embellishments as to why I did it, and why you (the jury) should secretly hate Travis and be grateful I killed him too. Juan is methodically showing the jury, and wow with the magazine evidence this is now in sharp focus, that this is just another fabricated story- just like the others, all with the same end purpose, only this one is the worst- she has attacked and destroyed the victims character for all the world to see to prove she was justified! If the jury believes this is a story (I believe Juan will prove it) then she is going down. She will be hated and despised by that jury.
Okay, so that was 1 purpose of the 2 that Juan is weaving the cross around.
The second point he needs to prove, the one we are technically all here because of, is proving premeditation. The first point is almost a sub story in this although not to Travis, his family or loved ones- this is what makes this one important on a different level... but to Juan, still very important.
Juans entire afternoon cross is him laying down the foundation- the one he kept hidden in his pocket during his case in chief, to prove unequivocal premeditation. He was NOT going to bring this information out during his CIC. He was going to wait to see the sociopathic defendant take the stand (he knew she would), and let her blather on and on with her foolish, self serving lies (he knew that too) and set her up to begin to trap her now (he's only setting the trap during her cross) but will spring it (so to speak) during his rebuttal case.
He is brilliant and for those of you who are doubting or concerned just be patient he is going to PROVE PREMEDIATION, I have absolutely no doubt now. He has proof and she will be proven a liar. Matt McCartney may have some sick love for Jodi- Darryl too, but Matt's roommate will not... Darryl's neighbors will not, and salon employee/owners will not. There is a lot more about her time in Pasadena too- someone she visited there that will have no love loss for Jodi, I am pretty certain.
Fear not- If the penalty of death is based on the premeditation factor then she will be sentenced to death. Juan has this wrapped up neatly, if he didn't he may have accepted the plea deal.
Just my opinions... we shall see.