Where can I hear more about that!
I pretty much summed it up above. She forged the letters, tried to represent herself, the letters were proven to be forgeries, she told the judge she was in over her head....she's back to having lawyers again.
Where can I hear more about that!
I haven't seen them. But I believe they were up high and child like. She was hoping to use that as part of Travis was a pedophile defense she manufactured with forged letters she had hoped people would believe were written by Travis admitting he was attracted to little girls.
I've objectively summarized the case a couple times now but those summaries are ignored. People prefer to cling to the emotional side of the argument, which I understand, but then ask for an objective view and when provided it, ignore it. C'est la vie.
That's what I figured Jody would say the pigtails were all about.
Do you think she was setting him up to blackmail him with his Ward, work, friends, family, other women? That way he could never leave her?
I've objectively summarized the case a couple times now but those summaries are ignored. People prefer to cling to the emotional side of the argument, which I understand, but then ask for an objective view or summary and when provided it, ignore it. C'est la vie.
This HuffPo article from 12/2011 is one of my go-to articles, a must-read IMO
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/29/jodi-arias_n_1174274.html
JA wearing ponytails would only work as a seduction tool if TA was, in fact, turned on by seeing such a thing. And JA knew that which implies he told her it was something he liked/turned him on. Otherwise, it's a very random and strange time to decide to wear pigtails, not knowing if it would get a positive reaction.
JA wearing ponytails would only work as a seduction tool if TA was, in fact, turned on by seeing such a thing. And JA knew that which implies he told her it was something he liked/turned him on. Otherwise, it's a very random and strange time to decide to wear pigtails, not knowing if it would get a positive reaction.
I've objectively summarized the case a couple times now but those summaries are ignored. People prefer to cling to the emotional side of the argument, which I understand, but then ask for an objective view or summary and when provided it, ignore it. C'est la vie.
Have you ever heard of role play? Some people like to do it. It isn't random or strange. Perhaps Jodi wanted to TRY it to see what kind of reaction she'd get. She didn't have to know it would get a reaction to want to try it.
Maybe he liked to hang onto the pony tails like bicycle handle bars during sex? Maybe he enjoyed a school fantasy ? So what?im missing the point. Maybe it was her fantasy not his at all?
We don't know .
It might be something that was a part of their sexual repertoire. Maybe TA did like envisioning JA as a younger female and maybe it did turn him on to see that.Have you ever heard of role play? Some people like to do it. It isn't random or strange. Perhaps Jodi wanted to TRY it to see what kind of reaction she'd get. She didn't have to know it would get a reaction to want to try it.
I'm much more interested in the objective side. I didn't know Travis or Jodi so the murder is just another one and it just happens to be local. I'm not any more invested in justice for Travis than I'm invested in justice for the thousands of others who die daily around the world by murder or otherwise. Maybe I'm a sociopath![]()
Two seemingly normal healthy adults (both well over the age of 21) meet and start dating/hanging out and have some sort of relationship, occasionally long distance and sometimes not. The male is deeply into the Mormon faith though is not following the strictest tenants of the religion and keeps that hidden as he and the female pursue sexual relations. The female adopts the male's religion and his persona and is clingy and is or becomes obsessive about this man. The male determines the relationship has no future and it eventually ends but continues in some fashion with one person not letting go (the female) and the male still engaging with the female. The dynamic is dysfunctional with both adults engaging in an ongoing sexual relationship as anger grows for both of them and the female's behavior shows violence. The female continues to escalate on to a "Glenn Close" level of bunny boiling behavior as she devolves from jealousy/rage/abandonment. At the end she plots or at least prepares for the male's demise and after one final tryst over many hours, murders the male by stabbing, slashing and finally shooting him and leaving his body. The crime demonstrates a rage type killing.