Originally Posted by SmoothOperator
Why the continual need to attempt to paint one *** more evil than the other? They are both evil and they are both guilty just as the Crown stated they are in it together.. I don't give a damn who wielded the hammer In my book they're both *** but by and far a landslide Michael Rafferty's evil trumps TLM by miles... and while I honestly believe it most likely that TLM wielded the hammer.. atleast at this point I believe itlikely to be TLM..its no matter as it still pales in comparison to the sexual deviance and evil in the *** that multiple times brutally raped this tiny child.. he deserves zero flattery of being the lesser of the two evils..
Respectfully snipped.
Well, this is likely the best and clearest post I have seen here in a while. That about sums it up, folks. We are having a trial. Yes, the Crown needs to prove that MR was there. TLM's testimony is suspect at times, but she readily admits that she committed the murder. Morally and legally, if it is proven that MR was there (and I believe that he was) then as SmoothOperator says:
In the end no matter they are both *** and to find a way to paint Rafferty in any other light than evil is a disgrace to Victoria Stafford and the pain and terror she suffered and endured.. moo.
I have been steadily reading here, but haven't the heart to post much. There is so much about this case that rips my heart out. What really bothers me though are the graphic theories in these threads of how TS suffered at the hands of her murderers, and queries regarding the forensic biology ... The trial has not yet addressed those aspects ... can we not just leave that be until the time comes? I can't help but think that the family of TS or people that knew her may read here from time to time, and I would like for all of us to be considerate by not theorizing before the actual evidence is presented in court.
Thanks!
JMO