This. I keep coming back to the seemingly strange fact that WE at least have no knowledge of them towing cars or being interested much in the cars (unless Ive missed that which is possible but its such a big indicator, IMO). Do we have any hard confirmation that cadaver dogs were brought through the house? Because if they were and they didnt hit on the house nor the car, Im very agreeable to the idea that whenever happened didnt happen there, and that transport didnt involve the car (unless it involved a car we dont know about that has yet to be brought to light and searched.
Also, regarding her interview. Her statement is very odd in regards to the falls, saying falls could either be cooking dinner...or at the park. Could either be? This is not a normal speech pattern when recounting past events, IMO. This is giving examples of how something COULD happen but not how something DID. Am I making sense? Just look at falls could either be, focus on that and try to use that naturally in recalling past situations. Its not adding up for me, right there. One might be more likely to say, IMO, for example, he has fallen while cooking dinner, or at the park.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk