MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #20 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not surprising that a do-over from a talent like Brennan is way tighter and apparently will pay much more attention to the available data to fix the timing and attempt to eliminate the dog stuff.

CW Theory - JOK never had time to get in the house before he was hit. According to CW he exited the car, checked a message from JMc, locked his phone again, and was hit 7 seconds later.

I wonder how they will established the "7 seconds' part. Seems like the trial might turn on whether the CW can be so precise.
 
Hi there, new to following the trial this time but have done alot of reading on the first trial etc.
Not decided yet on Guilt BARD but thought the prosecutor did a very powerful opening. The defence was okay but I thought came across as a little too aggressive and almost shouting at times.
 
The retrials I have watched have always ended in a guilty verdict, prosecutors know what evidence to focus on and what to ignore, witnesses are more confident and know what is coming and find the second go round easier, I expect Proctor to be a very different witness, much less bothered by what defence says as he has been fired and has nothing to lose, laying my cards I think she will be found G of all charges, let’s see if the trial changes my opinion
 
Hi there, new to following the trial this time but have done alot of reading on the first trial etc.
Not decided yet on Guilt BARD but thought the prosecutor did a very powerful opening. The defence was okay but I thought came across as a little too aggressive and almost shouting at times.
That is exactly how I feel.. Gave the vibe of to slick.
 
The retrials I have watched have always ended in a guilty verdict, prosecutors know what evidence to focus on and what to ignore, witnesses are more confident and know what is coming and find the second go round easier, I expect Proctor to be a very different witness, much less bothered by what defence says as he has been fired and has nothing to lose, laying my cards I think she will be found G of all charges, let’s see if the trial changes my opinion
At the end of the day she has to live with what she did. No big dollar lawyer will take that away.
 
At the end of the day she has to live with what she did. No big dollar lawyer will take that away.
I am not sure she is G, I just think she will be found G, I struggle to get beyond the corruption, so I think the actual truth was lost once LE began tampering with evidence and lying about evidence, then witnesses lied, if their was no reason to lie why lie, and why hide evidence from defence, JOK was a police officer, the case should have been investigated as professionally perfect as possible,

Yet LE are collecting blood his blood in red cups, not collecting or documenting his clothes properly, I have huge issues with LE in this case, and saw no real evidence to prove a collision in first trial,
 
Law and crime on YouTube is giving me so many ads.
 
I struggle to comprehend how a car hitting JOK caused the injuries that were found plus the absence of injuries one would expect, but the investigation left so much to be desired I don’t think we will ever know exactly what happened,
I could never vote G as the state relied upon LE who IMO were corrupt, but a retrial favours the state IMO so for now I expect the outcome to be G
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
130
Guests online
4,461
Total visitors
4,591

Forum statistics

Threads
622,997
Messages
18,460,131
Members
240,233
Latest member
FreeFall619
Back
Top