MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #28 Retrial

[waldojabba]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1924793991104741799

‘Some are defending Burgess by attempting to rationalize that he is credible because the CV he submitted to the DA was, in fact, accurate in that he admitted he had no degree. None of his prior misrepresentations matter, according to these people. The fact that he repeatedly misrepresented having a degree, what type of degree, and from what year is meaningless because he told the court the truth. In other words, he may have been a serial liar then, but not now. This is ridiculous. The jury has seen the witness’ penchant for academic dishonesty which he used to boost his unimpressive academic credentials. Academic integrity is of paramount importance for an expert. This should be obvious. That his most recent version is the most truthful version doesn’t cleanse his overall credibility problems. The online discourse regarding this case would be much more helpful if people would be intellectually honest and admit the obvious, whether it helps or hurts “their side.” Here, it is obvious that this expert is severely damaged. Do you think if a defense expert lied about academic credentials but came clean, the same people would dismiss that credibility issue as nothing?’

Amen to this ;
The online discourse regarding this case would be much more helpful if people would be intellectually honest and admit the obvious, whether it helps or hurts "their side.”

 

[kuromiiiilove]

View attachment 587299
Aside from Burgess lying about his education, he was obviously quick to criticize Ms Gaffney's workmanship by even naming her in his report "circuit board damage caused during initial chip off by Mrs Gaffney caused by overheating the component during the removal process".
Seems like he was trying to pump his chest out that he's so good at his work by throwing her under the bus. We all know that type of "colleague".

Funny that they claim the defense damaged the circuit board, considering the defense knew the chip-off process could cause damage and fought against it. The CW fought for it, Judge Cannone ruled for them, and then Guarino was not talented enough to complete the process, so Gaffney was brought in. Guarino observed Gaffney during the chip-off process. Just more twisting of the truth from the CW.

 

[tara83]

The SD card reveals the times. The truth of 1162. That's what everyone wanted right?

Everything else is a sideshow, the Lexus told us what happened. No one is talking about the reverse coinciding with the time John's phone last moved.

That's what I find interesting.

MOO

Just curious when I mentioned the study about the crash the FBI had done to you that said it wasn't a car crash you told me you didn't believe because experts were prone to error. But now an expert actually found to lie about how qualified he is should be believed? How does that work?

 

[kuromiiiilove]

The cross of Burgess continues.

 

[iamshadow21]

The cross of Burgess continues.

It is his cross to bear!

 

[Derph]

Round 2. Probably the LAST time this dude will ever be on the stand in a trial as an "expert" ever again. Enjoy your time on the stand liar!

 

[Forest_Wood]

Funny that they claim the defense damaged the circuit board, considering the defense knew the chip-off process could cause damage and fought against it. The CW fought for it, Judge Cannone ruled for them, and then Guarino was not talented enough to complete the process, so Gaffney was brought in. Guarino observed Gaffney during the chip-off process. Just more twisting of the truth from the CW.

Thank you. I didn't know who Gaffney actually was except she was working in the same field as a competitor and therefore an industry colleague to Burgess. Taking apart a motherboard of any computer has the risk for compact parts to be damaged. Even this guy Burgess likely could have damaged some of those electronic components when he worked on this board also. Even Guarino could have caused damage if he tried this process before Gaffney IMO. This guy Burgess should not be quick to criticize others.

 

[kuromiiiilove]

The cross of Burgess continues.

Alessi pointing out that Brennnan avoided bringing up Burgess’ degree history on direct.

 

[Elliot_Alderson]

*clicks seatbelt into buckle*

 

[kuromiiiilove]

Thank you. I didn't know who Gaffney actually was except she was working in the same field as a competitor and therefore an industry colleague to Burgess. Taking apart a motherboard of any computer has the risk for compact parts to be damaged. Even this guy Burgess likely could have damaged some of those electronic components when he worked on this board also. Even Guarino could have caused damage if he tried this process before Gaffney IMO. This guy Burgess should not be quick to criticize others.

She has worlds more experience than Burgess. She is actually a former MSP trooper. And holds an MS in Digital Forensics.

 

[lohrtabitha]

Alessi pointing out that Brennnan avoided bringing up Burgess’ degree history on direct.

Go get him Tiger!!!

 

[adot0902]

Ohhh I have a feeling Mr. Alessi is not in fact wrong.

 

[kuromiiiilove]

We are now looking at Burgess’ timeline. Burgess says his report is accurate up to the second for all power on and off events until Karen’s Lexus was towed to CPD.

Alessi now says that NONE of the five timelines from Mr. Burgess’ presentation are accurate at all, and certainly not down to the second.

Alessi asks Burgess if he is aware that all of the relevant events in the timeline he discussed in his presentation actually occurred January 29 2022, NOT January 30th, 2022. More to come.

Well, there goes ‘Alessi accepting the 1162 cycle’ as some were saying on this thread.

 

[kuromiiiilove]

We are now looking at Burgess’ timeline. Burgess says his report is accurate up to the second for all power on and off events until Karen’s Lexus was towed to CPD.

Alessi now says that NONE of the five timelines from Mr. Burgess’ presentation are accurate at all, and certainly not down to the second.

Alessi asks Burgess if he is aware that all of the relevant events in the timeline he discussed in his presentation actually occurred January 29 2022, NOT January 30th, 2022. More to come.

Well, there goes ‘Alessi accepting the 1162 cycle’ as some were saying on this thread.

Ok, Alessi is explaining this more. So once the timeline crosses into midnight, it’s 1/30/22, not 1/29/22. So the five timelines as Burgess testified to them yesterday are not accurate to the second, because Burgess got the date wrong.

Burgess calls this ‘parlance’

 

[DustysMom]

Just had a thought …. As a juror, I am watching CW’s witnesses lie, act evasive, and stretch the truth. Further, the judges attitude attitude is largely apathetic towards this as she allows these witnesses to ramble on and continues to admonish the defense for objecting. This would lead me to believe that ‘telling the whole truth’ is merely a suggestion — and I’d be tempted to take her ‘5 questions’ as such.

 

[Derph]

The guy had the wrong day????!!!!! OMG!! Talk about a hack!! This is only going to get worse. He can't even get the time right!!! And he's arguing about it!!! You can't make this up? Hahahahahahaha!

 

[kuromiiiilove]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1924818430428926095

 

[DustysMom]

Misspoke ? You are wrong because your ‘work’ is sloppy.

 

[Elliot_Alderson]

The guy had the wrong day????!!!!! OMG!! Talk about a hack!! This is only going to get worse. He can't even get the time right!!! And he's arguing about it!!! You can't make this up? Hahahahahahaha!

You can't make it up but I'm sure some are gonna bend over backwards to excuse it and try to explain it away JMO

 

[waldojabba]

Oh my he’s got the dates wrong on the timelines. And he’s arguing with Alessi and just calling it mis spoke.
JMO