Brennan is nitpicking mass calculation. Dr Wolfe points out Welcher made the same mass calculations.
Brennan is so rude. Questioning can be done and points can be made without being rude IMO
Brennan is nitpicking mass calculation. Dr Wolfe points out Welcher made the same mass calculations.
It's in his blood that he thinks the defense plays dirty like he does.Brennan back... he asked if he spoke with the defense over the weekend. He told them he was going home for the weekend, let them know last night he was back.
yep, 4 degrees is very very minimal and it's a normal adjustment when driving straight IMOThere was a 4 degree turn in steering. That’s nearly straight. Yes, taken from Welcher’s slide.
But the CW is obligated to prove John was killed by a car but their own witness the ME couldn't say that.The CW are under no obligation to disprove every piece of speculation the defence can come up with. The data shows the high speed reverse and the defence agree its proximity in time (and thus place) to within seconds. The only person who can confirm exactly where the reversing started from and finished is the defendant - but she is falsely claiming on video that she did not reverse.
I also note that BA and BH have not testified in this trial.
IMO/MOO
He is so immature, hardly professional.Brennan is so rude. Questioning can be done and points can be made without being rude IMO
Thank you. Ultimately, with all the noise, all the rabbit holes that can be gone down in this trial, there is only one thing that matters to the jury. Can the CW prove that Karen hit John?But the CW is obligated to prove John was killed by a car but their own witness the ME couldn't say that.
I just typed out and deleted a similar comment. Intentional obfuscation, then wrap up everything in rebuttal so the last clear thing the jury remembers is his witnesses. MOOOk, I think Brennan is going for confusion at this point... JMO
brennan is spending way too much time on this topic. It's already been explained it wouldn't make that much difference. I would guess the jury tuned out a long while ago. JMOOI just typed out and deleted a similar comment. Intentional obfuscation, then wrap up everything in rebuttal so the last clear thing the jury remembers is his witnesses. MOO
Is prosecution's last try to convict be with screwed up jury instructions? I did not pay attention when they debated them. But, can judge change them now?
Their last shot in the dark??She's the boss of applesauce, she can do anything she wants.![]()
Sounds like the defence want to abandon the cellar theory in favour of the garage - and thus John going up and down cellar stairs because the jury was never going to believe it was consistent with the phone location and battery temp data.
That would also appear to concede that the defence also believe the last 36 steps are John's final steps - which means he was with Karen in the car until 12.31 approx.
I guess the theory is John leaves the car and goes in the garage while Karen reverses at 24mph. This is of course inconsistent with Karen saying on video she saw John go in the house.
Shows how much pressure Brennan has applied.
MOO
She's the boss of applesauce, she can do anything she wants.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.