MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #34 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.

‘The prosecution case is being methodically decimated by expert medical testimony from Drs. Scordi-Bello, Laposata and Russell, supported by the opinions of Drs. Wolfe and Rentschler. The prosecution has nothing to challenge them. How is the prosecution eliminating reasonable doubt? Dr. Wolf (the neurologist) doesn't come close to doing that, if anything, he slightly helps the defense. The Aperture witnesses? 30 second snippets of Karen? This is not nearly enough. It is not a close call.’
 
ETA: she says as the swelling continued to grow, the heart and breathing would be disrupted. She said he could have died within 15-20 minutes after the blow to the back of the head.
RSBM

That contradicts Dr Wolf's testimony that raccoon eyes takes a minimum of 1 to 3 hours to develop.

starts around 2.46.09
 
I never know which other post will be shown when I post Sue's jury observations... but if you click on it, you can see all her other posts in a thread. She is probably the least bias reporter I could find in there lol She gets grief from all sides, which usually means she is doing a good job at reporting ;) IMO
 
I never know which other post will be shown when I post Sue's jury observations... but if you click on it, you can see all her other posts in a thread. She is probably the least bias reporter I could find in there lol She gets grief from all sides, which usually means she is doing a good job at reporting ;) IMO
I, for one, appreciate you posting them.
 
I never know which other post will be shown when I post Sue's jury observations... but if you click on it, you can see all her other posts in a thread. She is probably the least bias reporter I could find in there lol She gets grief from all sides, which usually means she is doing a good job at reporting ;) IMO
I like Sue a lot, and does appear unbiased.
Having some insight into the jury reactions (or non-reactions) is a good thing.
I'm concerned about the juror who hasn't taken any notes :/
IMO.
 
It's not within scope. The expert witness cannot speculate about where the victim fell.

If we are keeping score on these things, it's an example of AJ asking improper questions to influence the jury knowing full well they will be struck.
If a search warrant had been executed at 34F we'd likely know exactly where the victim fell...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
120
Guests online
579
Total visitors
699

Forum statistics

Threads
625,556
Messages
18,506,127
Members
240,815
Latest member
Ms Scarlett 86
Back
Top