- Joined
- Sep 29, 2023
- Messages
- 644
- Reaction score
- 6,537
Very nicely said from KR and Dad!
Why would she be under police surveillance. She was found not guilty. She can't be tried for the same crime again.I didn't follow the coverage very much, but there was reasonable doubt with the dog bite marks and whatnot. I'm sure she'll be under police surveillance forever, but I'm glad the jury took the instructions seriously.
I agree. That reading of verdicts was a bit odd and not consistent. But it doesn't matter that much.Was it just me but was the reading of the verdict confusing in itself?
In essence this was a true victory for John!!i can't imagine how hard this is for JOK's family to see everyone cheer and celebrate. imo, the jury got it right, but i can't help but to think about them.
I relistened and the baliff seemed to not ask the question re count 2 correctly. He initially asked if they found her guilty or not of count two, but didn't add "or any of the lesser included charges" and that seems to have been what tripped up the foreman.I agree. That reading of verdicts was a bit odd and not consistent. But it doesn't matter that much.
I think even the verdict reading was chaotic, but at least it’s inkeeping with the rest of the trial and courtroom shenanigans during this trial.I agree. That reading of verdicts was a bit odd and not consistent. But it doesn't matter that much.
Do we know that consuming alcohol is against the terms of her probation? It wasn't for her bond. But she hasn't been able to drive this entire time, which is probably why they didn't bother suspending her driver's license. Hopefully she gets her car back now.I wouldn’t even go have a drink if I were here. Probation officer would probably immediately run up on her with her first probation drug test JMO
I can finally go back to my morning Pilates classNow what will we do????![]()
Proctor should have to pay for the new taillightDo we know that consuming alcohol is against the terms of her probation? It wasn't for her bond. But she hasn't been able to drive this entire time, which is probably why they didn't bother suspending her driver's license. Hopefully she gets her car back now.
Extremely clear to me. The tail light diffuser rabbit hole… I believe there was AT LEAST one officer who participated in framing Karen.Wow!
I haven't followed this case at all. But it sounds like the evidence just was not there and it sounded like a police cover up IMO.
A bit different from LE becoming fixated on having the person responsible.
Was it that clear to everyone what happened?
I was on that from the beginning but have gotten away from it. With all the postponing I'm not sure when the trial is. I'll just start watching not knowing much about it like I did this one.Bryan Kohberger
He is sooo guilty!!