"Mr. Brennan claims that his investigation was “thorough.” If that were true, the Commonwealth would have uncovered what we, the defense, uncovered: hidden exculpatory evidence; lies and perjury by the Commonwealth’s own witnesses; cops covering for other cops; a biased and corrupt lead investigator with personal ties to witnesses; and inculpatory and suspicious conduct by myriad witnesses."
And there's MORE!
![]()
Karen Read attorney Alan Jackson blasts special prosecutor in new statement
Jackson’s comments come after Brennan on Monday said that a “campaign of intimidation and abuse” played a role in Read's recent acquittal.www.boston25news.com
AJ also wrote this.
The jury has spoken, but Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan, in an egregious breach of prosecutorial ethics, has tried to publicly shame and discredit that very jury. For him to attempt to supplant his personal views for that of the jury is a desperate attempt to save face in the wake of a unanimous rejection of the prosecution’s case.
The Rules of Professional Conduct are clear: A prosecutor should support the legitimacy of the justice system and promote public confidence in its operations. Openly attacking a jury’s verdict because he disagrees with it undermines that centuries-old edict.
I'm very glad he stood up for the jury. No prosecutor should ever dispute a legitimate verdict because he is unhappy with the result.