mysteriew
A diamond in process
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2004
- Messages
- 23,813
- Reaction score
- 923
IMO, that wording is based on the statute of the law. They didn't know he had a knife until they caught him after running. It was not why they chased him - they didn't see a potential transaction of the selling of the knife.
And of course, that was what they came up with to charge him, because they had nothing else.
If the SA is saying that the knife is legal, and this was an unlawful arrest...I have no doubt she has proof of that.
The SA says the knife was legal and that made the arrest illegal. Very true.
The PD has said the knife is illegal. That would have made the arrest legal.
Two contradicting statements and we are going to have to wait and see which side it comes down on.