Firstly I would like to thank the posters here for the warm welcome. I think I'm going to like it here :blushing:
I think BDE has a point about the lack of a body and reasonable doubt. I'm hoping this jury can see past that though, to the history of this man and how he disciplined children :furious: After all, there have been other convictions without a body, although prosecutors face a very uphill battle. One case in point is the conviction of Katherine Rutan in the murder of her six year old son Logan Tucker. The jury only deliberated two hours on that one.
I also think the biological mother's support might sway the jury. It's hard for some to believe that a mother would choose a man over their own child.
BBM. I have to wonder if the jury knows how many mothers have bore DL's children. It really does not seem any of them give much thought to who is seeding where and with whom for lack of a better term.
How much credibility will this jury give the women who chose to bare the child of a man who had children with many other women?