I am pretty relieved because the jury could have chosen to go with the 'lack' of forensics in this case. If they wanted to be lazy and negligent they could have ducked their responsibilities by saying the lack of a body and the lack of a witness and of a bloody crime scene, paved the way for a Not Guilty verdict. Thank Goodness these fine jurors actually thought the case through. NOBODY could be expected to believe that ridiculous carjacking story this monster tried to sell to the jury. That is all they needed, imo, to realize what a crock of chit that whole scenario was. And even though the poor 8 yr old child witness kind of pulled back on her prior testimony, it was obvious that her initial testimony, which was given that very day she lost her baby sister, was totally accurate and credible. JMO