- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 20,631
- Reaction score
- 324,969
Are they deliberating now? A see people, but no audio.
I'm reviewing the Defense closing argument.
I believe the judge was going to give final instructions first.
Are they deliberating now? A see people, but no audio.
It really doesn't make sense. I was an alternate juror the other year. I had to stay until deliberations began (I chose to stay because I was invested by then) but one of the seated jurors was a younger "kid" who showed up late on our second day. It does seem risky.Why are the alternates ever dismissed, prior to verdict?????
I believe so, too. I was also surprised they name dropped the juror's last name.I predict that the Defense will call for a mistrial.
I believe so, too. I was also surprised they name dropped the juror's last name.
I hope they end up seating the funny alternate. He seemed genuine.The good news, deliberationing barely started. So starting fresh with an alternate won't be hard.
All three indicated they had opinions -- unstated -- but I think we can all imagine what those opinions are. But that's not because they weren't impartial or had consumed information outside of the courtroom. It just means that the State was effective.
This will be revisited at appeal if this goes forward to trial.
But even if a juror had done the above during trial, IMO it wouldn't rise to immediate dismissal of the juror.
Very curious to see how the judge handles this.
Dismissing the alternates was a mistake. Don't know if that was the judge's error/discretion or the policy in that jurisdiction. Either way, it's bad form for this very reason.
JMO