raisincharlie
Racing Doesn't Lie
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2004
- Messages
- 16,856
- Reaction score
- 142
Hey Scandi,scandi said:I read this at CTV, and it made sense to me, though I couldn't tell if it was from a link or from the poster: " . .The victim was found inside the family residence. The vehicle was not used to transport the body in the commission of a crime. The vehicle was returned..
I also read over there that the SW has 21 pages. Has anyone here seen this. I wonder if that's a compilation of all the SWs?
Hope you are having a good day.
The 21 pages relating to search warrants - the N & O link for the first 6 warrants is 21 pages. I can tell you the warrant for the SUV has more pages than the five posted at the N & O site - the inventory list is not terminated by the words "Nothing follows" - this is standard procedure so that items cannot be added to the inventory list after the fact. The same is true for the Biirchleaf warrant - there are additional unpublished pages. This may be due to the media not publishing those pages or it could be the pages have been attached to additional affidavits which are possibly sealed.
As for the statement you quoted - no idea where that comes from - the act of placing items related to a crime inside the vehicle makes the vehicle a part of the crime - not sure what transport of a body has to do with anything relating to this case. As we know from past cases, this statement is not true as Peterson (S) definitely used his truck to transport a body. That vehicle was returned at the request of a motion filed by Geragos. In this case - the reports identify JYs lawyer as filing a request as well. Seems reasonable to release the vehicle as any useable forensics would have been collected at this time. I think people are trying to decide if this means there was something or nothing of evidentiary value found in the vehicle. Speculation IMO
