MN - Journalist Don Lemon arrested for church protest, Minneapolis, 18 Jan 2026

[Inthedetails]

The message cannot be about members of the church because we still don't know anything about them.

snipped

We sure as heck do know something about that church because of the protest and news coverage.

Well, apparently not all of us. I can't control what others are consuming (or not consuming) for news content.

jmopinion

 

[Sundog]

I predicted yesterday morning he would be home by supper. I also think it’s unlikely he will be convicted. Don has made a career also, in my opinion, of suing people. His attorney will be strong. However, I believe the initial no probable cause was prepared within 48 hours of the incident. They have since had days to pursue subpoenas and warrants. Don’s own unedited raw footage is pretty damming. IMO

There will also be witnesses from among the congregation and some may have their own videos. And he was indicted by a grand jury so they believed their was probable cause that he was guilty of the offences as charged.

I assume the trial will be in Minnesota? I don't think they would have all the witnesses travel away from their homes.

There will also likely be a civil suit, no matter what happens at the criminal trial. I look forward to the church members and the church getting justice.

 

[witchway]

I look forward to the families of Renee Good and Alex Pretti getting justice for their deaths. Which we only knew about due to journalist attention to what happened. And in a big way independent journalists in the beginning, Thank you to their efforts to get these stories out. my opinion and fact

 

[otto]

We sure as heck do know something about that church because of the protest and news coverage.

Well, apparently not all of us. I can't control what others are consuming (or not consuming) for news content.

jmopinion

Did Don Lemon publish factual information about that church?

Lemon's age-restricted "journalistic" youtube video appears to be about disrupting a religious meeting.

In my opinion, Don Lemon has become the news, and other journalists are researching and gathering facts about why he was involved in a protest that violated the FACE Act.

 

[witchway]

In Don Lemon’s thread?

imo

The whole church protest addressed her death as well at a bigger level.

 

[otto]

The whole church protest addressed her death at a bigger level.

Children were attending church when a mob entered to intentionally provoke, disrupt and cause upset ... to those children. Surely there are more appropriate options to express an opinion without targeting children.

 

[Cryptic]

The question in this case is did LEMON participate or was he serving as press.

Press members are not participants.

Reading the law cited by @otto , my guess is that Don Lemon is going to get squeezed. His status as journalist might not matter.

The law states that it is illegal for anybody to interfere with a religious service by physical obstruction at a place of worship. So.... Lemon following the rioters in, then "interviewing" the church goers sound like he physically obstructed a church service.

Likewise, if I follow rioters into a mosque service and shove my phone into an Imams face and then "interview" him about radical Islam (my phone and my blog make me an independent journalist- right?), I would be physically obstructing / interfering with a mosque service.

 

[witchway]

There will also be witnesses from among the congregation and some may have their own videos. And he was indicted by a grand jury so they believed their was probable cause that he was guilty of the offences as charged.

I assume the trial will be in Minnesota? I don't think they would have all the witnesses travel away from their homes.

There will also likely be a civil suit, no matter what happens at the criminal trial. I look forward to the church members and the church getting justice.

“..I assume the trial will be in Minnesota? I don't think they would have all the witnesses travel away from their homes…”

What trial?

 

[Inthedetails]

Did Don Lemon publish factual information about that church?

snipped

Don Lemon (and the other journalists who were there) brought attention to a white nationalist church with a leader who is with ICE.

I don't mind repeating that over and over if needed.

Just because I didn't pay attention to the church protest until the arrests doesn't mean audiences of the journalists didn't. The word got out because of their coverage. I personally wasn't paying much attention until the arrests, but I don't represent the entire audience of those journalists.

jmopinion

 

[Inthedetails]

Reading the law cited by @otto , my guess is that Don Lemon is going to get squeezed. His status as journalist might not matter.

The law states that it is illegal for anybody to interfere with a religious service by physical obstruction at a place of worship. So.... Lemon following the rioters in, then "interviewing" the church goers sound like he physically obstructed a church service.

Likewise, if I follow rioters into a mosque service and shove my phone into an Imams face and then "interview" him about radical Islam (my phone and my blog make me an independent journalist- right?), I would be physically obstructing / interfering with a mosque service.

Might have been worth it to draw attention that at least one ICE member is a leader at a white nationalist church.

jmopinion

 

[Cryptic]

“Independent journalism is fundamental to democratic governance because it scrutinizes government actions, exposes corruption, and enables informed citizen participation. When governments arrest or otherwise crack down on journalists —

Thinking if I follow others into a mosque and shove my phone into an Imams face- then "interview" him about terrorism- while ordering him not to push me- wink, nod, there is a chance I might not be functioning as an "independent journalist".

That aside, you do have good points. As much as I think the Lemon needs to squeezed, under what are the charges against him, and under what authority was he arrested?

 

[Inthedetails]

Thinking if I follow others into a mosque and shove my phone into an Imams face- then "interview" him about terrorism- while ordering him not to push me- wink, nod, there is a chance I might not be functioning as an "independent journalist".

snipped.

No, that wouldn't work because you are not, in fact, a journalist.

jmo

 

[Cryptic]

Might have been worth it to draw attention that at least one ICE member is a leader at a white nationalist church.

jmopinion

What about synagogues with IDF members. Are they "cool", or "uncool"? If uncool, can they be invaded?

 

[Inthedetails]

What about synagogues with IDF members. Are they "cool", or "uncool"? If uncool, can they be invaded?

Cool or uncool? What?

 

[Cryptic]

No, that wouldn't work because you are not, in fact, a journalist.

Is there a legal definition of "journalist"? And, especially an "independent journalist"?

 

[Inthedetails]

Is there a legal definition of "journalist"? And, especially an "independent journalist"?

Well, one indictation would be the ability to look up information.

Professional journalist means a person regularly engaged in collecting, photographing, recording, writing, editing, reporting, or publishing news, for gain or livelihood, who obtained the information sought while working as a salaried employee of, or independent contractor for, a newspaper, news journal, news agency, press association, wire service, radio or television station, network, or news magazine. Book authors and others who are not professional journalists, as defined in this paragraph, are not included in the provisions of this section.

Professional journalist Definition | Law Insider

Define Professional journalist. means a person regularly engaged in collecting, photographing, recording, writing, editing, reporting, or publishing news, for gain or livelihood, who obtained the information sought while working as a salaried employee of, or independent contractor for, a...

www.lawinsider.com

 

[Cryptic]

Cool or uncool? What?

You stated that it may of been worth it to expose and ICE officer (apparently uncool-right?).

So, I was just wondering if you felt worship services attended by other possible "uncool" people (IDF members?) would be worth disrupting.

 

[Cryptic]

Well, one indictation would be the ability to look up information.

Professional journalist means a person regularly engaged in collecting, photographing, recording, writing, editing, reporting, or publishing news, for gain or livelihood, who obtained the information sought while working as a salaried employee of, or independent contractor for, a newspaper, news journal, news agency, press association, wire service, radio or television station, network, or news magazine. Book authors and others who are not professional journalists, as defined in this paragraph, are not included in the provisions of this section.

And.... "independent journalist"?

 

[Inthedetails]

You stated that it may of been worth it to expose and ICE officer (apparently uncool-right?).

So, I was just wondering if you felt worship services attended by other possible "uncool" people (IDF members?) would be worth disrupting.

I am not following this cool/uncool conversation and respectfully disengage. I'm not 12.

jmo

 

[otto]

snipped

Don Lemon (and the other journalists who were there) brought attention to a white nationalist church with a leader who is with ICE.

I don't mind repeating that over and over if needed.

Just because I didn't pay attention to the church protest until the arrests doesn't mean audiences of the journalists didn't. The word got out because of their coverage. I personally wasn't paying much attention until the arrests, but I don't represent the entire audience of those journalists.

jmopinion

Was it journalism.

After her arrest, many became aware of the reason that Ms. Levy Armstrong, the church protest organizer, violated the FACE Act. Several other protesters (some with cameras/ microphones) were also arrested.

If Don Lemon's journalistic intent was to present evidence-based verified facts, gathered openly and responsibly in accordance with professional ethics, why is his published information restricted to protesters at a church? If the journalistic message was about a member of the church, how did violating, or filming the violation of, the FACE Act inform that message?

https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/senate-bill/636

Protest at Minnesota Church Service Adds to Tensions Over ICE Tactics

The Justice Department said it would investigate the protest over a pastor’s apparent role in immigration enforcement in the state.

www.nytimes.com

https://caj.ca/wp-content/uploads/caj_whatisjournalism_dec_2021.pdf