MN - Journalist Don Lemon arrested for church protest, Minneapolis, 18 Jan 2026

  • #501
Journalist Don Lemon charged with federal civil rights crimes after covering anti-ICE church protest

I love living in the nonsense version of America, where a government which got to power by appealing to white Christian nationalists and enacting racist policies can charge a black journalist with federal “civil rights crimes” for exercising his rights as both a journalist and a citizen. Orwell would have a stroke just having someone attempt to explain modern America to him.

“IMO”/“MOO”
 
  • #502
YES. They don't like independent journalists because they aren't owned by corporate $$$ and aren't towing his line. I'm pointing out the underlying reasons here, which clearly are related to race. He was not the only person of color arrested!
The protestors claimed the church was favoring whites which is not proven but are they not supporting a race based on favoritism of it's color, black.
Did you mean to reply to me? Nothing about what you said has anything to do with my post, so I was just confused if you replied to the wrong person?
You were saying he was in that church as a journalist. It looks to me that is not the case.
 
  • #503
As far as I can tell, Lemon is redacted. Is that wrong?

ETA. That car ride that is in the affidavit has words that came straight from Lemon and his name is redacted.
Okay, I see my error now, this is not the document I thought you were referencing. I thought you were referring to the document we discussed yesterday with the court caption but this is an affidavit in support of that GJ indictment doc. Thank you, off to read.
 
  • #504
Okay, I see my error now, this is not the document I thought you were referencing. I thought you were referring to the document we discussed yesterday with the court caption but this is an affidavit in support of that GJ indictment doc. Thank you, off to read.
Enjoy. :) Looking forward to your observations!
 
  • #505
The protestors claimed the church was favoring whites which is not proven but are they not supporting a race based on favoritism of it's color, black.

You were saying he was in that church as a journalist. It looks to me that is not the case.

"David Easterwood, who leads the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) field office in St. Paul, also apparently serves as a pastor at a church that was disrupted by protesters on Sunday."

Hard to serve all your congregation if you're working for ICE.

"Whitaker’s view illuminates what the MAGA freakout over this protest is ignoring: that freedom of religion is not a shield against criticism of a church’s teachings, especially when those teachings are impacting the lives of other people. Cities Church, he said, “is home to a pastor that works for a federal agency kidnapping brown-skinned immigrants and killing unarmed citizens.” The anti-empathy and bigoted views taught inside the church are directly affecting people outside of it."

"Joe Rigney, one of Cities Church’s founders, has recently become a MAGA media darling because he, along with podcaster Allie Beth Stuckey, has been pushing the idea that empathy is a sin. He now serves as associate pastor at Christ Church in Moscow, Idaho, a congregation led by Doug Wilson, a pastor who has praised race relations under slavery and denounced women’s suffrage, to argue that people are “being manipulated by empathy.” Rigney’s misogyny is never far from the surface, including when he denounced empathy as evidence that “feminism is a cancer” because it allows women to move beyond just being “life-givers and nurturers” and into public spaces, where their allegedly toxic compassion is a “curse.”' The pro-ICE church is worse than you think
 
Last edited:
  • #506

"David Easterwood, who leads the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) field office in St. Paul, also apparently serves as a pastor at a church that was disrupted by protesters on Sunday."

Hard to serve all your congregation if you're working for ICE.

Don Lemon has been charged with violating federal laws related to religious freedom after participating in a protest that disrupted a worship service at a Minnesota church. The charges stem from allegations that he conspired to interfere with the First Amendment rights of worshippers during the protest against an immigration enforcement official who served as a pastor at the church.

There are many church groups out there with different views. The Satanic Temple is recognized as a religious organization and claims the right to religious freedom under the First Amendment, advocating for civil rights and the separation of church and state.
 
  • #507
Don Lemon has been charged with violating federal laws related to religious freedom after participating in a protest that disrupted a worship service at a Minnesota church. The charges stem from allegations that he conspired to interfere with the First Amendment rights of worshippers during the protest against an immigration enforcement official who served as a pastor at the church.

There are many church groups out there with different views. The Satanic Temple is recognized as a religious organization and claims the right to religious freedom under the First Amendment, advocating for civil rights and the separation of church and state.
Lemon is a journalist who was not part of the protest. He's on audio stating he was only there documenting and not part of the group. That's the profession of journalism to witness and report. His rights are protected under the 1st amendment--"Freedom of the press". https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/

First Amendment​

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Lastly, these same charges were thrown out by another federal magistrate two weeks ago because they are baseless.
 
  • #508
How does Don discussing if he can go in or not prove he was a protestor or part of the planning process of the protest? To me it shows that he’s considering himself as a journalist/member of the press. Journalists don’t not cover stories just because the people they are covering may be breaking a law. All just MOO.

"David Easterwood, who leads the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) field office in St. Paul, also apparently serves as a pastor at a church that was disrupted by protesters on Sunday."

Hard to serve all your congregation if you're working for ICE.

"Whitaker’s view illuminates what the MAGA freakout over this protest is ignoring: that freedom of religion is not a shield against criticism of a church’s teachings, especially when those teachings are impacting the lives of other people. Cities Church, he said, “is home to a pastor that works for a federal agency kidnapping brown-skinned immigrants and killing unarmed citizens.” The anti-empathy and bigoted views taught inside the church are directly affecting people outside of it."

"Joe Rigney, one of Cities Church’s founders, has recently become a MAGA media darling because he, along with podcaster Allie Beth Stuckey, has been pushing the idea that empathy is a sin. He now serves as associate pastor at Christ Church in Moscow, Idaho, a congregation led by Doug Wilson, a pastor who has praised race relations under slavery and denounced women’s suffrage, to argue that people are “being manipulated by empathy.” Rigney’s misogyny is never far from the surface, including when he denounced empathy as evidence that “feminism is a cancer” because it allows women to move beyond just being “life-givers and nurturers” and into public spaces, where their allegedly toxic compassion is a “curse.”' The pro-ICE church is worse than you think
One of Kirk's comments that went viral of course was that he did not believe in empathy. There you go. The movement. IMO
 
  • #509
"Joe Rigney, one of Cities Church’s founders, has recently become a MAGA media darling because he, along with podcaster Allie Beth Stuckey, has been pushing the idea that empathy is a sin. He now serves as associate pastor at Christ Church in Moscow, Idaho, a congregation led by Doug Wilson, a pastor who has praised race relations under slavery and denounced women’s suffrage, to argue that people are “being manipulated by empathy.” Rigney’s misogyny is never far from the surface, including when he denounced empathy as evidence that “feminism is a cancer” because it allows women to move beyond just being “life-givers and nurturers” and into public spaces, where their allegedly toxic compassion is a “curse.”' The pro-ICE church is worse than you think

Anxiously awaiting someone to come around and explain to me how empathy really is a noxious aspect of humanity but also that their viewpoints deserve to be respected!

“IMO”/“MOO”
 
  • #510
I agree, the church’s affiliation is somewhat irrelevant to the discussion. My only thought is in order for the DOJ to win this case, they will have to show proof that Mr Lemon conspired with the protestors to plan this demonstration, and that he acted as a protestor and not a journalist by doing that. As I stated before, we do not need to debate if Don Lemon is a journalist - we all know he is (whether or not we like him or agree with his stance and how he reports the news). He IS a journalist. He was in that church as a journalist, he stated this many times. But to me, the only way the DOJ will win is if they prove he was part of the planning of the protest. Otherwise, his first amendment rights as a journalist override any Congressional acts. All MOO.
There are some paragraphs in the indictment that suggest more involvement than that of independent observer and journalist. For example, Lemon attending a meeting with organizers that were gearing up for a resistance operation against the government might be a problem. Maybe it doesn't matter.

If protesters had done this at any location other than a church, no one would object. If reporting had been done outside the church, again, not a problem.

The issue that I think is problematic is taking a protest inside a church during a religious meeting where children are present. Why is there a complete absence of respect for the rights of those children? In my opinion, it muddies the cause when the rights of others are violated during that "resistance operation".

That is, they violate the rights of others while objecting the the violation of the rights of others. It becomes: do as I say, not as I do.

My understanding is that, initially, the target of the protest was a man who was not at the church. Then the target moved and became an allegation that people who attend the church are white-supremacists.

The goal was resistance against federal immigration policy. Was anyone in the church during the protest responsible for immigration policy?

 

Attachments

  • 1769966157551.webp
    1769966157551.webp
    36 KB · Views: 4
  • 1769966314069.webp
    1769966314069.webp
    32.4 KB · Views: 3
  • 1769966403429.webp
    1769966403429.webp
    31.3 KB · Views: 3
  • 1769966448577.webp
    1769966448577.webp
    34.8 KB · Views: 4
  • #511
Of course I can't find the video now, but Don Lemon is on audio/video saying he was there to document, he wasn't part of the protest (someone asked him at the time, in the church)
It might not matter. The law appears to state that it is illegal for anybody to disrupt a church service. That might include a journalist barging into "interview" people.

I strongly suspect that there why only the indies showed up.
 
  • #512
Lemon is a journalist who was not part of the protest. He's on audio stating he was only there documenting and not part of the group. That's the profession of journalism to witness and report. His rights are protected under the 1st amendment--"Freedom of the press". https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/

First Amendment​

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Lastly, these same charges were thrown out by another federal magistrate two weeks ago because they are baseless.
"He's on audio stating he was only there documenting and not part of the group". Of course he would say this. His motivation not to be charged with violating federal laws.

Don Lemon and the protesters allegedly engaged in intimidating behavior that obstructed church members from exiting, causing fear among children and congregants during the disruption. There is video evidence of that.
 
  • #513
"He's on audio stating he was only there documenting and not part of the group". Of course he would say this. His motivation not to be charged with violating federal laws.

Don Lemon and the protesters allegedly engaged in intimidating behavior that obstructed church members from exiting, causing fear among children and congregants during the disruption. There is video evidence of that.
He's a journalist!!! I was watching his stream on that day, he was reporting on the ground in Minnesota, and someone suggested he check out the church. He had no idea what was going on prior. All his videos are posted on his Youtube channel if you want to see for yourself. Highly recommend.

"A journalist is a professional who gathers, writes, and reports on news and current events. They are responsible for investigating and uncovering important information, and presenting it to the public through various mediums such as newspapers, magazines, television, and online publications. Journalists play a critical role in informing the public and holding those in power accountable. They must possess strong research, writing, and interviewing skills, as well as the ability to think critically and objectively." https://jobs.community.kaplan.com/career/journalist
 
  • #514
It might not matter. The law appears to state that it is illegal for anybody to disrupt a church service. That might include a journalist barging into "interview" people.

I strongly suspect that there why only the indies showed up.

If I build a building, put in some pews, and nail a cross to the wall, do I make myself immediately immune from criticism, protesting, or “disruptions” of any kind? Do you get to talk about how much you hate women and brown people as much as you want as long as you cloak yourself as “church”? Is free speech and protest limited to the rest of us if we don’t adhere to a religion, despite living in a country where we have the freedom of religion and from religion? What about separation of church and state? If the State repeatedly aligns itself with churches of a certain kind, then doesn’t our right to protest extend to the incestuous relationship that has been unconstitutionally woven between them?
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
113
Guests online
1,353
Total visitors
1,466

Forum statistics

Threads
639,265
Messages
18,740,023
Members
244,622
Latest member
Tallulah1970
Back
Top