MN - Journalist Don Lemon arrested for church protest, Minneapolis, 18 Jan 2026

[tlcya]

I see the person who prepared/signed the affidavit has opinions on the Renee Good incident. MOO RG was not involved in an illegal protest.

Some of the redactions I can positively tell are DL's name redacted based on context around them and what I know about DL's livestream. Some are not so clear and IMO may refer to Fort. What I can tell refers to DL is disturbing. It would be one thing IMO if he had received a phone call or messages saying get to [church address] a "disruption/protest" is about to happen. But his meeting up at the grocery store parking lot. His livestreaming the prep for this event, his seeming, to me, clear knowledge of where they were going beforehand and taking measures not to give it away, his entry into the church to watch that show go down, all of that to me doesn't exactly scream journalistic integrity or disinterested third party observer. That is JMO I am a bit disappointed in his decisions that day. I worry he crossed a line.

I haven't landed on a particular side of the fence yet, but I am taking the info in as it becomes available.

 

[maamager]

don’t flame me but i don’t see a huge deal in protesting a church or their pastor. imo

 

[otto]

By chance I was watching his live stream that day. He had no knowledge ahead of time, nor part of the planning. He makes a practice of asking questions of people he comes in contact with while on the ground, and was told about some gathering at a church. He was respectful even about entering the church, asking people outside about what was going on. As far as I could tell he was there briefly documenting, then left. For what it's worth....

If Don Lemon had no knowledge prior to the church protest, and was not part of the planning, why did he meet co-conspirators at a shopping center for a pre-op briefing?

Why did he explain that he had just arrived in Minneapolis and was there to speak with an organization gearing up for protest?

Don Lemon indictment

www.documentcloud.org

FBI affidavit in suport of arrest warrant | PDF | U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement | American Government

This affidavit, submitted by Special Agent Timothy Gerber, outlines the investigation into a group of agitators who disrupted a religious service at Cities Church in St. Paul, MN on January 18, 2026. The group, led by Nekima Valdez Levy-Armstrong and Chauntyll Louisa Allen, coordinated their...

www.scribd.com

 

[LAborn]

View attachment 641070

I see the person who prepared/signed the affidavit has opinions on the Renee Good incident. MOO RG was not involved in an illegal protest.

Some of the redactions I can positively tell are DL's name redacted based on context around them and what I know about DL's livestream. Some are not so clear and IMO may refer to Fort. What I can tell refers to DL is disturbing. It would be one thing IMO if he had received a phone call or messages saying get to [church address] a "disruption/protest" is about to happen. But his meeting up at the grocery store parking lot. His livestreaming the prep for this event, his seeming, to me, clear knowledge of where they were going beforehand and taking measures not to give it away, his entry into the church to watch that show go down, all of that to me doesn't exactly scream journalistic integrity or disinterested third party observer. That is JMO I am a bit disappointed in his decisions that day. I worry he crossed a line.

I haven't landed on a particular side of the fence yet, but I am taking the info in as it becomes available.

Then every journalist alive is guilty of being a participate in the stories they report. All of them get "tips" and follow up on them, then document and report. That's their job.

 

[Hexe]

My question here, is that Mr. Lemon is no longer working for a news agency. Did he travel to Minneapolis to insert himself into a drama to be relevant again?

What does it have to do with what he did or did not do during the demonstration in the church?

 

[LAborn]

My question here, is that Mr. Lemon is no longer working for a news agency. Did he travel to Minneapolis to insert himself into a drama to be relevant again?

He's an independent reporter, who streams live via his Youtube channel. Been doing it since he left CNN. He travels to where stories are happening. For example, when the government shut down happened, he traveled to DC to interview people impacted during the protracted shutdown. There are quite a few people/groups who do this on a regular basis and it's very useful to viewers who want to know what's happening in real time, but can't travel.

 

[Hexe]

The law appears to state that it is illegal for anybody to disrupt a church service. That might include a journalist barging in to "interview" people.

For all I know Lemon was interviewing people when they were leaving. He did not disrupt the service in order to interview anybody. If you have any evidence showing otherwise, please share.

MOO

 

[Rolypolyoly]

bbm^^

Feel the same way? Have ICE agents been woken up to dozens of officers at their door to arrest them like this Georgia Fort was?

jmo

No, but at least 3 should have IMO.

 

[CSIDreamer]

By chance I was watching his live stream that day. He had no knowledge ahead of time, nor part of the planning. He makes a practice of asking questions of people he comes in contact with while on the ground, and was told about some gathering at a church. He was respectful even about entering the church, asking people outside about what was going on. As far as I could tell he was there briefly documenting, then left. For what it's worth....

What people outside? I missed that part. TY.

 

[Hexe]

That's the question - whether the man was a journalist or an agitator. Did he have an opinion about the people in the church prior to asking them questions, or was he gathering information so that his audience could form an independent opinion?

Having an opinion is not a crime and journalists are free to have one about anything, like every other human being.

MOO

 

[Summerliz03]

For all I know Lemon was interviewing people when they were leaving. He did not disrupt the service in order to interview anybody. If you have any evidence showing otherwise, please share.

MOO

He interviewed the pastor of the church, who spoke with him for several minutes. The pastor could have at any time during that interview said, I do not want to make any statements and walked away, but he didn’t. This was all done after the church service was over.

 

[LAborn]

What people outside? I missed that part. TY.

There were a few people milling about outside, maybe parishioners? Not sure, but he just greeted them, asked how they were doing and kept walking. It was freezing outside, so very few!!!

 

[otto]

He interviewed the pastor of the church, who spoke with him for several minutes. The pastor could have at any time during that interview said, I do not want to make any statements and walked away, but he didn’t. This was all done after the church service was over.

This affidavit in support of the arrest warrant has been linked several times.

Could the pastor have walked away? Is it true that he chose to not walk away? Not according to this affidavit.

When the pastor asked the protesters to leave, is it appropriate for the "journalist" so say: "you don't want us to worship?"

Is the journalist suggesting that the protesters are there to worship? If not, why does he passively accuse the pastor of interfering with their freedom to worship when they are asked to leave?

FBI affidavit in suport of arrest warrant | PDF | U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement | American Government

This affidavit, submitted by Special Agent Timothy Gerber, outlines the investigation into a group of agitators who disrupted a religious service at Cities Church in St. Paul, MN on January 18, 2026. The group, led by Nekima Valdez Levy-Armstrong and Chauntyll Louisa Allen, coordinated their...

www.scribd.com

 

[Summerliz03]

What people outside? I missed that part. TY.

He interviewed several parishioners and one of the pastors outside the church (it started in the doorway of the church as they were leaving and then continued outside) I was told official TikTok accounts are allowed so I have attached the two videos - 1 is him interviewing a pastor and 1 is interviewing a parishioner. These are both from Don Lemons official TikTok account.


Edit, they are large files so I will have to split them into two comments. The 2nd interview will be in my next comment.

 

[Summerliz03]

What people outside? I missed that part. TY.

Here’s his interview with a parishioner as he was leaving the church.

Edit: The file won’t upload so I will attach the link directly to TikTok.

TikTok - Make Your Day

 

[Ontario Mom]

He interviewed the pastor of the church, who spoke with him for several minutes. The pastor could have at any time during that interview said, I do not want to make any statements and walked away, but he didn’t. This was all done after the church service was over.

This is not accurate. Pastor Parnell was closing in prayer when Lemon entered the church. The pastor was about to begin his sermon, and had asked congregants to turn to the book of the Bible of text he was preaching from. At that moment, some of the protesters inside the church stood up and began yelling, and immediately disrupted the service, and then Lemon began talking from behind his camera. The service was defintely not over, the protestors stopped it from taking place as scheduled.

You can see and hear all of this on Lemon's own live stream. He barged up to Pastor Parnell after the service was interrupted, and started badgering him with questions. At which time Pastor Parnell told him straight up, all of this is utterly shameful.

 

[bearfossils]

If Don Lemon had no knowledge prior to the church protest, and was not part of the planning, why did he meet co-conspirators at a shopping center for a pre-op briefing?

I mean, isn’t that basic level reporting? Following an individual and/or group through the entirety of the actions you’re documenting, from start to finish?

<modsnip>

 

[otto]

He interviewed several parishioners and one of the pastors outside the church (it started in the doorway of the church as they were leaving and then continued outside) I was told official TikTok accounts are allowed so I have attached the two videos - 1 is him interviewing a pastor and 1 is interviewing a parishioner. These are both from Don Lemons official TikTok account.


Edit, they are large files so I will have to split them into two comments. The 2nd interview will be in my next comment.

A journalist wearing a toque, winter coat with hood up, dark sunglasses? Transparent? Unafraid to be recognized?

 

[CSIDreamer]

There were a few people milling about outside, maybe parishioners? Not sure, but he just greeted them, asked how they were doing and kept walking. It was freezing outside, so very few!!!

So that was after he exited the church? What about while he was inside?

 

[Barbb]

I think he's going to be charged. I read one person saying, "Had he been a journalist in 1963, he might claim no wrongdoing in stationing himself beside Lee Harvey Oswald in the Texas School Book Depository, camera poised, awaiting President Kennedy's motorcade to broadcast the assassination live. Under this view, press credentials would exempt him from misprision of a felony (18 U.S.C. § 4), which is the crime of knowing of a felony and failing to disclose it promptly.

Misprision demands only advance knowledge and nondisclosure; participation or aid heightens guilt. Reports describe the church disruption as coordinated, with Lemon entering alongside the protesters to capture the planned interference. By prioritizing footage over alerting authorities, he crossed from observation into complicity.

No statutory exemption exists for journalists under either misprision or conspiracy statutes".

It's a good point. Just because someone doesn't walk away when their rights are being violated doesn't mean they haven't been violated. A person's federal rights can still be violated even if they communicate with the violator. The violation occurs when the person who fails to uphold constitutional rights, regardless of any interaction. The absurdity of Lemon claiming First Amendment privilege to destroy the First Amendment rights (freedom of religion) to another is delicious irony.