This a thousand times.I'm not sure why you keep repeating the same thing. What did Don Lemon do that was illegal?
This a thousand times.I'm not sure why you keep repeating the same thing. What did Don Lemon do that was illegal?
I agree, and I truly think Pam Bondi knows the charges won’t stick. She doesn’t care, it’s all just political theater to hype up the group of people who are so convinced that their religious freedoms are under attack, primarily white Christian nationalists. Who ironically enough, are the same people pushing for more religion in schools (but only Christianity), more religion in politics (but only Christianity), and seem to support the violent removal of their literal neighbors, which is the complete opposite of any of Jesus’ teachings. I say this as a Christian myself, who goes to church regularly and supports the freedom of religion in this country (but this goes for ALL religions, not just Christianity), nothing about the current administration is Christian and I have a hard time understanding how or why any Christian person supports it. All just MOO.Pam Bondi et al don't even need the charges to stick. They got their arrest b rolls. They got to sanctimoniously announce that freedom of worship will be protected. (As if that is going to distract me from the fact the citizens' rights to be on their own sidewalks or cars without getting killed has been taken away.) Pam Bondi is hoping people think, well, if he got arrested, he must have done something wrong. And thus, even though the charges won't stick, she has achieved her goal.
MOO
Scripture is pretty clear about treatment of strangers and those in need. AFAIK, there is nothing Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, or Secular Humanist about this. The protest that Lemon was covering was a protest against ICE. There is no argument that ICE is acting in a Christian way. Being that they are behaving extra-judicially, going against training, and targeting law-abiding people, there isn't even the, "but the law" argument. It's pretty rich if anyone thinks this administration is pro-Christian.I agree, and I truly think Pam Bondi knows the charges won’t stick. She doesn’t care, it’s all just political theater to hype up the group of people who are so convinced that their religious freedoms are under attack, primarily white Christian nationalists. Who ironically enough, are the same people pushing for more religion in schools (but only Christianity), more religion in politics (but only Christianity), and seem to support the violent removal of their literal neighbors, which is the complete opposite of any of Jesus’ teachings. I say this as a Christian myself, who goes to church regularly and supports the freedom of religion in this country (but this goes for ALL religions, not just Christianity), nothing about the current administration is Christian and I have a hard time understanding how or why any Christian person supports it. All just MOO.
Exactly. The main person is a minister and civil rights lawyer. Come on now.Scripture is pretty clear about treatment of strangers and those in need. AFAIK, there is nothing Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, or Secular Humanist about this. The protest that Lemon was covering was a protest against ICE. There is no argument that ICE is acting in a Christian way. Being that they are behaving extra-judicially, going against training, and targeting law-abiding people, there isn't even the, "but the law" argument. It's pretty rich if anyone thinks this administration is pro-Christian.
The protesters were not anti-Christian. They were anti ICE.
Lemon was not a protester. He was a journalist.
MOO
Don Lemon was tipped off about the protest ahead of time, but did not know that the protest would disrupt the church service. As an independent journalist, should he be gathering information, or "arguing with a parishioner about immigration enforcement" ?As Ms. Armstrong stated in her interview with Chris Cuomo, her desired effect of the protest was to inform both the parishioners and the public that the church had a pastor that works for ICE. She wasn’t specifically protesting to David Easterwood, but more to spread awareness that churches may not be a safe haven for immigrants if they employ a pastor who is also serving as an ICE agent. So it truly didn’t matter that Mr. Easterwood was there, IMO. But she clearly explains her reasons for protesting that church during her interview.
So in other words stay at home? A journalists job is literally the opposite.Don Lemon was tipped off about the protest ahead of time, but did not know that the protest would disrupt the church service. As an independent journalist, should he be gathering information, or "arguing with a parishioner about immigration enforcement" ?
Armstrong wanted to draw attention to Mr Easterwood, and to inform the congregation about his involvement with immigration law.
Was there no better way to inform the congregation about Mr Easterwood than to traumatize families with children? Armstrong sounds like a well-educated woman, a civil rights lawyer. Could she not inform them by handing out a pamphlet at the doors of the church? Why was trauma used to communicate her opinion to people attending church? Why did Lemon choose to associate himself with trauma-style communication?
"At the event, hosted by Black Lives Matter Minnesota and other local organizations ... the church protest over the weekend was organized by Nekima Levy Armstrong, a civil rights lawyer. She said she wanted to draw attention to a church leader, David Easterwood, who also appears to be the acting director of ICE’s field office for enforcement and removal operations in St. Paul....Ms. Levy Armstrong, the church protest organizer, said that in the lawsuit filed earlier this month against ICE’s tactics, she saw that Mr. Easterwood was named as a defendant for overseeing “a racial profiling campaign of massive scale and with devastating consequences,” and connected him with the church. She compared Mr. Easterwood’s appearance in an October news conference alongside Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem with a sermon he delivered at the church that was posted to YouTube.Ms. Levy Armstrong said she circulated her plan for interrupting the service on social media as a way to raise awareness among the congregation of Mr. Easterwood’s involvement in the immigration crackdown."
January 19, 2026
![]()
Protest at Minnesota Church Service Adds to Tensions Over ICE Tactics
The Justice Department said it would investigate the protest over a pastor’s apparent role in immigration enforcement in the state.www.nytimes.com
"Lemon said he was at the demonstration as a journalist. He said he was tipped off ahead of time but did not know the activists would disrupt the service. He can be seen arguing with a parishioner about immigration enforcement."
January 30, 2026
![]()
Ex-CNN journalist Don Lemon faces Minnesota protest charges
Former CNN news anchor Don Lemon appeared in court on Friday to face federal charges over his role covering a protest at a Minnesota church against President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, the Republican administration's latest move against a critic.www.reuters.com
Kimmel began the interview asking Lemon how he was feeling, and the former CNN anchor said: “I don’t know — that’s an honest answer,” before adding, “I’m OK, I’m not going to let them steal my joy, but this is very serious. These are federal criminal charges.”
Exactly! I keep thinking about tRump's perfect phone call to Zelenskyy to ask him to "SAY there is an investigation into Biden & Hunter", there doesn't even have to be one, just say it! IMOPam Bondi et al don't even need the charges to stick. They got their arrest b rolls. They got to sanctimoniously announce that freedom of worship will be protected
It's about methods. Did the congregation need to be shocked, or are they reasonable people who could understand a message through calm verbal or written communication?So in other words stay at home? A journalists job is literally the opposite.
They knew what they were facing and were willing to do it. I am glad this happened as it really did shed light on what is happening here. Historically we never would have known for example about Watergate, but a few brave journalists and a brave undercover informant…jmo
They thought a coordinated invasion of the church, while engaging in acts of oppression, intimidation, threats, interference, and physical obstruction was a good idea. ( imo and from the indictment that includes Don Lemon).It's about methods. Did the congregation need to be shocked, or are they reasonable people who could understand a message through calm verbal or written communication?
What did the independent journalist achieve by "arguing with a parishioner about immigration enforcement?" Why did the independent journalist ask the pastor whether he was allowed to worship when the question was not genuine? After the pastor welcomed him to worship, the independent journalist remained in the church for another 13 minutes but did not worship.
Did the independent journalist ask himself whether trauma-style communication is most effective with a church congregation? Did he report on that style of communication when the message relates to notifying people about an immigration officer?
Why didn't any of the protesters/ independent journalist stop and ask themselves whether the best method to inform parishioners about the job roles of a member of their church was to disrupt a church service? Was the independent journalists story about informing people about the identity of individual immigration officers?
![]()
Ex-CNN journalist Don Lemon faces Minnesota protest charges
Former CNN news anchor Don Lemon appeared in court on Friday to face federal charges over his role covering a protest at a Minnesota church against President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, the Republican administration's latest move against a critic.www.reuters.com
![]()
FBI affidavit in suport of arrest warrant | PDF | U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement | American Government
This affidavit, submitted by Special Agent Timothy Gerber, outlines the investigation into a group of agitators who disrupted a religious service at Cities Church in St. Paul, MN on January 18, 2026. The group, led by Nekima Valdez Levy-Armstrong and Chauntyll Louisa Allen, coordinated their...www.scribd.com
~ in my opinion ~
BBMIn my opinion, shock and trauma style communication, to inform a church congregation about a member of their church, should not be condoned. That is the story that should have been told by the independent journalist. That is a message that everyone can understand.
Although people are upset with federal officer methods in upholding immigration law, there are lines that should not and cannot be crossed under any circumstances. Anger due to federal immigration officer actions does not justify traumatizing children in a church.
~ in my opinion ~
There's a strong emphasis on separating Don Lemon from the legal documents, and to interpret his role independent of protesters. He claims that he was in the church during the religious meeting for the purpose of telling a story - to report on the protest.They thought a coordinated invasion of the church, while engaging in acts of oppression, intimidation, threats, interference, and physical obstruction was a good idea. ( imo and from the indictment that includes Don Lemon).
The only peaceful people that day, were the congregants, who accepted strangers among them. Don Lemon had the nerve to ask the pastor if they were not allowed to worship. Why didn’t the just sit quietly and worship?