MN - Journalist Don Lemon arrested for church protest, Minneapolis, 18 Jan 2026

  • #841
  • #842
  • #843
If you have facebook/instagram, here is Ronan Farrow on the arrests of journalist of Don Lemon and Georgia Fort. Or maybe it works here regardless.

He did the Harvey Weinstein story as well. That’s really worth a read.
He is a winner of the Pultzer Prize for Public Service in 2018.
 
Last edited:
  • #844
As Ms. Armstrong stated in her interview with Chris Cuomo, her desired effect of the protest was to inform both the parishioners and the public that the church had a pastor that works for ICE. She wasn’t specifically protesting to David Easterwood, but more to spread awareness that churches may not be a safe haven for immigrants if they employ a pastor who is also serving as an ICE agent. So it truly didn’t matter that Mr. Easterwood was there, IMO. But she clearly explains her reasons for protesting that church during her interview.
Don Lemon was tipped off about the protest ahead of time, but did not know that the protest would disrupt the church service. As an independent journalist, should he be gathering information, or "arguing with a parishioner about immigration enforcement" ?

Armstrong wanted to draw attention to Mr Easterwood, and to inform the congregation about his involvement with immigration law.

Was there no better way to inform the congregation about Mr Easterwood than to traumatize families with children? Armstrong sounds like a well-educated woman, a civil rights lawyer. Could she not inform them by handing out a pamphlet at the doors of the church? Why was trauma used to communicate her opinion to people attending church? Why did Lemon choose to associate himself with trauma-style communication?

"At the event, hosted by Black Lives Matter Minnesota and other local organizations ... the church protest over the weekend was organized by Nekima Levy Armstrong, a civil rights lawyer. She said she wanted to draw attention to a church leader, David Easterwood, who also appears to be the acting director of ICE’s field office for enforcement and removal operations in St. Paul.
...

Ms. Levy Armstrong, the church protest organizer, said that in the lawsuit filed earlier this month against ICE’s tactics, she saw that Mr. Easterwood was named as a defendant for overseeing “a racial profiling campaign of massive scale and with devastating consequences,” and connected him with the church. She compared Mr. Easterwood’s appearance in an October news conference alongside Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem with a sermon he delivered at the church that was posted to YouTube.

Ms. Levy Armstrong said she circulated her plan for interrupting the service on social media as a way to raise awareness among the congregation of Mr. Easterwood’s involvement in the immigration crackdown."​

January 19, 2026

"Lemon said he was at the demonstration as a journalist. He said he was tipped off ahead of time but did not know the activists would disrupt the service. He can be seen arguing with a parishioner about immigration enforcement."​

January 30, 2026
 
  • #845
Don Lemon was tipped off about the protest ahead of time, but did not know that the protest would disrupt the church service. As an independent journalist, should he be gathering information, or "arguing with a parishioner about immigration enforcement" ?

Armstrong wanted to draw attention to Mr Easterwood, and to inform the congregation about his involvement with immigration law.

Was there no better way to inform the congregation about Mr Easterwood than to traumatize families with children? Armstrong sounds like a well-educated woman, a civil rights lawyer. Could she not inform them by handing out a pamphlet at the doors of the church? Why was trauma used to communicate her opinion to people attending church? Why did Lemon choose to associate himself with trauma-style communication?

"At the event, hosted by Black Lives Matter Minnesota and other local organizations ... the church protest over the weekend was organized by Nekima Levy Armstrong, a civil rights lawyer. She said she wanted to draw attention to a church leader, David Easterwood, who also appears to be the acting director of ICE’s field office for enforcement and removal operations in St. Paul.​
...​
Ms. Levy Armstrong, the church protest organizer, said that in the lawsuit filed earlier this month against ICE’s tactics, she saw that Mr. Easterwood was named as a defendant for overseeing “a racial profiling campaign of massive scale and with devastating consequences,” and connected him with the church. She compared Mr. Easterwood’s appearance in an October news conference alongside Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem with a sermon he delivered at the church that was posted to YouTube.​
Ms. Levy Armstrong said she circulated her plan for interrupting the service on social media as a way to raise awareness among the congregation of Mr. Easterwood’s involvement in the immigration crackdown."​

January 19, 2026

"Lemon said he was at the demonstration as a journalist. He said he was tipped off ahead of time but did not know the activists would disrupt the service. He can be seen arguing with a parishioner about immigration enforcement."​

January 30, 2026
So in other words stay at home? A journalists job is literally the opposite.
They knew what they were facing and were willing to do it. I am glad this happened as it really did shed light on what is happening here. Historically we never would have known for example about Watergate, but a few brave journalists and a brave undercover informant…jmo
 
  • #846
  • #847
I think this thread will just continue to go in circles until the next hearing on the 9th and we learn more information from both the prosecution and the defense. IMO, Don Lemon reporting on news people don’t like doesn’t make him less of a journalist and doesn’t make what he did illegal. I wasn’t even a Don Lemon fan before this, never watched him on CNN, don’t follow him now. I have zero opinions on him as a person or journalist. I would say the same thing about this case if it was Megyn Kelly covering an anti-abortion protest. Journalists covering the news is not illegal and at this point, I haven’t seen any evidence that Don Lemon was acting as a protestor and not a journalist. All MOO.
 
  • #848
So in other words stay at home? A journalists job is literally the opposite.
They knew what they were facing and were willing to do it. I am glad this happened as it really did shed light on what is happening here. Historically we never would have known for example about Watergate, but a few brave journalists and a brave undercover informant…jmo
It's about methods. Did the congregation need to be shocked, or are they reasonable people who could understand a message through calm verbal or written communication?

What did the independent journalist achieve by "arguing with a parishioner about immigration enforcement?" Why did the independent journalist ask the pastor whether he was allowed to worship when the question was not genuine? After the pastor welcomed him to worship, the independent journalist remained in the church for another 13 minutes but did not worship.

Did the independent journalist ask himself whether trauma-style communication is most effective with a church congregation? Did he report on that style of communication when the message relates to notifying people about an immigration officer?

Why didn't any of the protesters/ independent journalist stop and ask themselves whether the best method to inform parishioners about the job roles of a member of their church was to disrupt a church service? Was the independent journalists story about informing people about the identity of individual immigration officers?



~ in my opinion ~
 

Attachments

  • 1770137034957.webp
    1770137034957.webp
    37.1 KB · Views: 7
  • 1770137382350.webp
    1770137382350.webp
    73.3 KB · Views: 7
  • #849
In my opinion, shock and trauma style communication, to inform a church congregation about a member of their church, should not be condoned. That is the story that should have been told by the independent journalist. That is a message that everyone can understand.

Although people are upset with federal officer methods in upholding immigration law, there are lines that should not and cannot be crossed under any circumstances. Anger due to federal immigration officer actions does not justify traumatizing children in a church.

~ in my opinion ~
 
  • #850
It's about methods. Did the congregation need to be shocked, or are they reasonable people who could understand a message through calm verbal or written communication?

What did the independent journalist achieve by "arguing with a parishioner about immigration enforcement?" Why did the independent journalist ask the pastor whether he was allowed to worship when the question was not genuine? After the pastor welcomed him to worship, the independent journalist remained in the church for another 13 minutes but did not worship.

Did the independent journalist ask himself whether trauma-style communication is most effective with a church congregation? Did he report on that style of communication when the message relates to notifying people about an immigration officer?

Why didn't any of the protesters/ independent journalist stop and ask themselves whether the best method to inform parishioners about the job roles of a member of their church was to disrupt a church service? Was the independent journalists story about informing people about the identity of individual immigration officers?



~ in my opinion ~
They thought a coordinated invasion of the church, while engaging in acts of oppression, intimidation, threats, interference, and physical obstruction was a good idea. ( imo and from the indictment that includes Don Lemon).

The only peaceful people that day, were the congregants, who accepted strangers among them. Don Lemon had the nerve to ask the pastor if they were not allowed to worship. Why didn’t the just sit quietly and worship?
 
  • #851
  • #852
They thought a coordinated invasion of the church, while engaging in acts of oppression, intimidation, threats, interference, and physical obstruction was a good idea. ( imo and from the indictment that includes Don Lemon).

The only peaceful people that day, were the congregants, who accepted strangers among them. Don Lemon had the nerve to ask the pastor if they were not allowed to worship. Why didn’t the just sit quietly and worship?
There's a strong emphasis on separating Don Lemon from the legal documents, and to interpret his role independent of protesters. He claims that he was in the church during the religious meeting for the purpose of telling a story - to report on the protest.

The story that Black Lives Matter Minnesota, other local organizations, and organizer Nekima Levy Armstrong (a civil rights lawyer) wanted to tell is that church member David Easterwood is a federal immigration officer.

A major component of the story is that protesters disrupted a church service screaming "nazi" while "confronting children saying "do you know your parents are nazis, they're going to burn in hell." That is how the civil rights lawyer informed the congregation that a member of their church is a federal officer.

That is not the story that I understood from everything I've seen from Don Lemon. I have not seen any story from Lemon about whether the protest was effective in communicating that Mr Easterwood is an immigration officer. Legal documents were required to understand the story.

Don Lemon said that he will be more outspoken, but what is the story? That protesters have the right to traumatize children in church to communicate their anger? Whether intended or not, that is the journalistic story I hear him telling.




~ in my opinion ~
 

Attachments

  • 1770140431166.webp
    1770140431166.webp
    66.4 KB · Views: 6
  • #853
I think this thread will just continue to go in circles until the next hearing on the 9th and we learn more information from both the prosecution and the defense. IMO, Don Lemon reporting on news people don’t like doesn’t make him less of a journalist and doesn’t make what he did illegal. I wasn’t even a Don Lemon fan before this, never watched him on CNN, don’t follow him now. I have zero opinions on him as a person or journalist. I would say the same thing about this case if it was Megyn Kelly covering an anti-abortion protest. Journalists covering the news is not illegal and at this point, I haven’t seen any evidence that Don Lemon was acting as a protestor and not a journalist. All MOO.
I agree. This is not the hill I want to die on. I do come back because I care and when I read this and that I tend to react.

IMO: I think it will end up like the sandwich guy.
 
  • #854
The story that Black Lives Matter Minnesota, other local organizations, and organizer Nekima Levy Armstrong (a civil rights lawyer) wanted to tell is that church member David Easterwood is a federal immigration officer.

A major component of the story is that protesters disrupted a church service screaming "nazi" while "confronting children saying "do you know your parents are nazis, they're going to burn in hell." That is how the civil rights lawyer informed the congregation that a member of their church is a federal officer.
The affidavit you linked literally stated that William Kelly said that, not Armstrong.
 
  • #855
Yes it is.

DOJ says it will investigate, press charges after activists disrupt church where Minnesota ICE official is a pastor​


snip...The photos on both sites match.

'The website of St. Paul-based Cities Church lists David Easterwood as a pastor, and his personal information appears to match that of the David Easterwood identified in court filings as the acting director of the ICE St. Paul field office. Easterwood appeared alongside DHS Secretary Kristi Noem at a Minneapolis press conference last October'
What is the purpose of this? Target a man's church because of what he does for a living? Is there any allegation that this man has done anything wrong? Or is it just that he may or may not work for ICE?
 
  • #856
What is the purpose of this? Target a man's church because of what he does for a living? Is there any allegation that this man has done anything wrong? Or is it just that he may or may not work for ICE?
It's victim blaming 101. The pastor is also not the one indicted, he's a victim as well as his church.
 
  • #857
What is the purpose of this? Target a man's church because of what he does for a living? Is there any allegation that this man has done anything wrong? Or is it just that he may or may not work for ICE?
The answer to those questions is located in this thread and in several articles around the internet, plus interviews given by the protest organizer, Lekima Levy Armstrong.
 
  • #858
  • #859
I’m not buying what she’s selling.

moo
You don’t believe the spoken words of the woman who planned the protest for plainly stating why they wanted to protest the church? Even if you don’t agree with her, her beliefs or her actions, she’s telling you the reason SHE and her group wanted to protest the church. She wanted the parishioners of the church and the general public to know that one of the pastors there was employed by ICE. That’s literally it.
 
  • #860
You don’t believe the spoken words of the woman who planned the protest for plainly stating why they wanted to protest the church? Even if you don’t agree with her, her beliefs or her actions, she’s telling you the reason SHE and her group wanted to protest the church. She wanted the parishioners of the church and the general public to know that one of the pastors there was employed by ICE. That’s literally it.
That’s one of the most absurd reasons I’ve seen for a protest. Being employed by ICE isn’t a crime. <modsnip> imo
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
305
Guests online
2,365
Total visitors
2,670

Forum statistics

Threads
639,486
Messages
18,743,753
Members
244,469
Latest member
pulaskiatnight
Back
Top