- Joined
- Nov 9, 2015
- Messages
- 5,043
- Reaction score
- 47,401
I think it depends whether the church knew Easterwood had a side hustle as an ICE agent. Not as an employee who is visible as an ICE agent on the street gassing his congregants or pushing them down but as a white shirt administrator who organizes the terror.I’m shocked that the church isn’t considered a victim in this. I don’t know what to think about that. imo
A church is no longer a victim if they know what their pastors engage in, when they aren't in the pulpit. Especially if it doesn't align with their teachings. Sort of like the catholic church wasn't a victim when they'd re-home a sexual deviant to another parish to appease those who had been hurt. Then they could assault more children in a different parish.
Here's some further clarification for you. Yes, it's AI but I presume it's taken from numerous sources. I think this particular section is very timely and apropos to the subject:
- Jobs that Create Conflicts of Interest
Roles that place a pastor in a position of split loyalty, where they might have to choose between their employer's gain and the well-being of their congregation, are considered unsuitable.- Political positions with high controversy: Taking sides in polarizing political issues can damage the unifying role of a pastor.