- Joined
- Oct 3, 2017
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 23
I really want to put this theory out there why has no ever connected Alton Coleman to this case its eerily similar he lived close enough and went on a spree in 1984, this may be his first kill.
[h=1]From The Vault: Serial killer and rapist Alton Coleman terrorized Tri-State in 1984[/h]
"He has a way of getting next to people," Capt. Thomas Williams, commander of the Norwood Police Criminal Investigative Section, said at the time. "He can talk his way into the home. He meets people on the street and he can discuss religion, he can discuss politics. He's very forward, very well spoken, very calm …
"And very deadly."
In the six weeks before Coleman, 29, and his 23-year-old girlfriend, Debra Brown, knocked on the Walters' front door, the Illinois man had already raped and killed three girls under 10 and two young women from Wisconsin, Indiana and northern Ohio.
One of the girls was the daughter of a woman Coleman had befriended. One of the women he killed met Coleman through her minister. Coleman had lured her by saying he wanted to go to church with her.
By Chad Garrison[h=1]The Case That Haunts[/h] [h=2]The most notorious cold case in the history of the St. Louis Police Department still haunts homicide detectives[/h]
Never a suspect, never an arrest, and never was the head found. Most of what is known of Jane Doe came within days of her discovery. She was likely between the ages of eight and eleven. She was big for her age, around four-foot-ten. Without the head, she measured just over four feet. She had been raped and then strangled. Based on the lack of blood at the crime scene, police believe she was dumped in the basement after her beheading. Mold growing from the wound on her neck indicated she was there for several days before the two men found her.
Little else is known about the girl who has become the most notorious cold case in the nearly 200-year history of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department.
In his mind, Joe Burgoon can still see the building where they found the girl. It is three stories high, brick, with the Latin word for home, Domi, inscribed in stone above the doorway. Traces of blood streak the cellar walls where the killer dragged the body into the darkness. There's no smell of death. The coolness of the basement preserved the body.
Other leads have been less conventional. Grasping for clues, Burgoon once sat in on a séance in a Maplewood home. Under dim candlelight the detective passed around photocopied fingerprints of Jane Doe to a table full of psychics. As the clairvoyants channeled the spirits, Burgoon sat in the corner and observed.
"The psychics put their hands on the fingerprints and would shoot straight up in their chairs like they got a jolt or something," remembers Burgoon. "At the end of the meeting they told me to call the Coast Guard. The head is on a boat in the Gulf of Mexico."
Perhaps the most far-fetched story surrounding the case came in 2002 when Sharon Nolte called detectives. A Kansas City insurance investigator, she was convinced Jane Doe was a Chippewa Indian named Shannon Johnson. Nolte said she also knew the killer, a drifter living in southern Texas.
She worked the case independently for seven years before contacting the police, her investigation taking her to an Indian reservation in Minnesota where she collected sample DNA from a woman she believed to be related to Jane Doe.
As with all the people who have stepped forward to help police solve the case, Carroll and Burgoon say they appreciate Nolte's efforts, but in the end her story just didn't add up.
"You don't want to play anyone cheap," says Burgoon. "In a case as tough as this one, you want to listen to what anyone has to say. What do you have to lose?"
Of the many theories homicide detectives kick around, the most common pins Jane Doe's killing on a parent or close relative. If they're serving a prison term for some other crime, police may soon know Jane Doe's identity, and possibly that of her killer.
Jane Doe's memorial is in stark contrast to the one left to a little girl in Kansas City. It was there, in 2001, that police stumbled across the headless body of a three- to five-year-old African-American girl. Immediately, detectives began looking for similarities between Jane Doe and the Kansas City victim but failed to find any link. Like Jane Doe, the Kansas City victim's identity and that of her killer remain an enigma.
Three years later, Carroll has not entirely ruled out a connection.
"Hard to believe this could happen twice in the same state and not be related," he says. "Maybe the culprit was in prison for fifteen to eighteen years for another crime and came back to do the same thing again."
Only thing is, your find went missing in 1985 and this UID was located in 1983. Keep up the good work. Had not come across your find yet.
Early last month, I attended Karen T Taylor's workshop on Drawing to Depict the Deceased for Identification in San Marcos, Texas. One of the students there was Thom Shaw - the artist who works for Parabon NanoLabs, and who produces the Snapshot DNA Phenotyping facial composites. I suggested to him that this case would be an ideal candidate for the work that they do.
He indicated that his company has been interested in trying to get business in the state of Missouri. He said that there are a couple of organizations that provide grants for cold case investigations, and he said that St. Louis has a much better shot at receiving a grant due to it's population and crime rates.
So last Thursday, I contacted Detective Dan Sweeney, who is in charge of this case. I gave him Thom's contact information, and suggested that he look into getting a facial composite done for this girl. From the tone of our conversation, he seemed to be very interested.
Hopefully they can get this done.
Early last month, I attended Karen T Taylor's workshop on Drawing to Depict the Deceased for Identification in San Marcos, Texas. One of the students there was Thom Shaw - the artist who works for Parabon NanoLabs, and who produces the Snapshot DNA Phenotyping facial composites. I suggested to him that this case would be an ideal candidate for the work that they do.
He indicated that his company has been interested in trying to get business in the state of Missouri. He said that there are a couple of organizations that provide grants for cold case investigations, and he said that St. Louis has a much better shot at receiving a grant due to it's population and crime rates.
So last Thursday, I contacted Detective Dan Sweeney, who is in charge of this case. I gave him Thom's contact information, and suggested that he look into getting a facial composite done for this girl. From the tone of our conversation, he seemed to be very interested.
Hopefully they can get this done.
I just sent an email to her ME suggesting they reach out to journalists in the new isotope areas. I also suggested they look into DNA phenotyping to possibly build her a face from her DNA. Crossing my fingers they reply!
Aurora releases DNA-generated composite of suspect in 1984 slaughter of Bennett family - Parabon specializes in DNA phenotyping. It creates images that help police identify possible suspects of unsolved crimes.
Building a Face, and a Case, on DNA
At some point the Smithsonian redid her isotope testing to get different states, I haven't had a chance to look for an article but it's on her Doe net page. They did the same thing to another Jane Doe I follow. I am clueless how it goes from South to North.
Full Anthropology exam and isotope analysis completed by NCMEC and the Smithsonian. Advanced forensic testing of her bones has also suggested that the female was not originally from the local St. Louis area but possibly spent most of her childhood in the following states: Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Indiana, and West Virginia.
I’m sure it’s been asked. I’ve followed this case for awhile but could she be exhumed and have the testing done that determines what part of the country she spent time in?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk