• #20,561
I wonder if detainee cosplays with a medieval shield on a certain body part???

They said it was him on the video....

Yeah, yeah...
 
  • #20,562
I’m so torn here - obviously not wise for her to be talking but BE has always, especially throughout this case, reported with the utmost integrity. I’m inclined to believe she was out there and speaking and BE gave her the platform she was seeking rather than him compelling her to speak. I truly think she has nothing to hide and wants to be heard.

Maybe distinction without difference - but I think BE operates with excellent ethics so I’m inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.
I don't think it's illegal fwiw. I just find it cringy (for her, not BE).
 
  • #20,563
Brian Entin interviewed the mother-in-law of the detained man. She seemed certain he does not look like the man in the video and that he did not leave in the middle of the night when this happened. But who knows. He and his wife are doing door dash to get money to get their own place she said.
 
  • #20,564
If you follow the road, Camino Agosto, away from the highway, it just leads up into the mountains... 😓
 
  • #20,565
She shouldn't be talking, sorry. I'm sure she's in shock, but no need to talk. (Though I want the perp caught and convicted)
That she is being interviewed like this, while her house is being searched and her family's phones have been taken away gives me an uncomfortable feeling. The likelihood that she will be interviewed by LE soon is high, and she has just been giving statements to a reporter who SHOULD know better.

If we also factor in that she is Hispanic, lives near the border and might have a relative involved in a what is now a high-profile crime...this will cause her and her family more problems than not. Someone should have guided her away from the press, or kept the press at a distance until she had been interviewed by LE.

That's just my opinion. I know many will disagree. I want NG found, and I am praying she is safe, but in this nation you are innocent until proven guilty, and we cannot assume that a POI who has not, per the authorities involved, been charged deserves to have his name revealed in an interview rather than through official channels.

Again...opinion.
 
  • #20,566
i don't think BE should be interviewing her either. bad form. he could end up cleared by LE by the time they're done questioning him, but now people will be probing into him and his family. i'm not comfortable with that until LE formally names him as a POI.

I agree.
I heard the MIL give her son-in-law’s last name, but I don’t feel right to discuss it until he’s determined to be the actual POI.

I think since the news on NG morphed today from a drought to a tsunami, Brian and the other newscasters, the ones like him who travel on location, are falling off their feet with exhaustion. Less cautious than usual.

JMO
 
  • #20,567
CNN just interviewed the mother-in-law of the person who has been detained for questioning. She has no idea who Nancy Guthrie is. She said that she told law-enforcement they could come and search her home because she has nothing to hide.

She also said he’s a delivery driver in the Tucson area.
 
  • #20,568
If the person detained is not related to the abduction, I'm worried what that could mean for NG and the real abductors. I'm feeling really uneasy.
 
  • #20,569
  • #20,570
Without more details it’s hard to say, but I wonder if this is possibly related to the ransom demand rather than the kidnapping? Clearly LE has some evidence implicating this person in a crime if they obtained a search warrant — curious to know what led them to this person, digital forensics? A tip? DNA?
My guess is it's something related to at least one of the ransom notes. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense otherwise.
 
  • #20,571
  • #20,572
I go to the bathroom and end up another 10 pages behind! You guys gotta slow down!! 🤣
 
  • #20,573
I’m so torn here - obviously not wise for her to be talking but BE has always, especially throughout this case, reported with the utmost integrity. I’m inclined to believe she was out there and speaking and BE gave her the platform she was seeking rather than him compelling her to speak. I truly think she has nothing to hide and wants to be heard.

Maybe distinction without difference - but I think BE operates with excellent ethics so I’m inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

sorry, no. i went to school for journalism. the ethical thing to do would be to speak to her and not air it. i don't think he's being intentionally malicious, but he's been covering this case since the beginning and is probably tired. he should rest, but i don't like this at all.

not saying the guy detained isn't guilty, but we have literally no way to know what led them down this trail or what basis they're questioning him on. it's pretty irresponsible to air an interview with his family.
 
  • #20,574
  • #20,575
The media attention alone would be a motivator, guilty or not. I sure as heck would and I'm not involved in any crimes.
Yeah - people shouldn't automatically make too much of a wiped profile. Remember, after the shooting at Brown University a couple of months back, the online geniuses decided a pro-palestine/anti-Israel student was to blame and when he wiped his profiles and Brown took down mentions of him from their uni pages, people claimed it was because we was the shooter. (Narrator: he was not the shooter).

Edited to add - there are definitely examples of situations where LE took down profiles of someone they thought was guilty. But b/c it goes both ways, I wouldn't assume it's automatically determinative.
 
Last edited:
  • #20,576
  • #20,577
  • #20,578
She said he works during the week in Tucson for UPS.
But in another interview on CNN she said "I don't know...Fed X." My thought is that he might work for a temp agency and works for multiple delivery companies.

Maybe he is the guy that had the Amazon uniform on caught trespassing that was posted by Pima Co Sherrif
 
  • #20,579
Barged in without a warrant...and even cuffed the son that was playing Nintendo who is not the subject of the investigation. Not good. If this is really the guy, it could hurt their case.
Why do you think they don't have a warrant? It's typical to detain/secure anyone in the house for officer safety. This isn't crazy.
 
  • #20,580
How certain is it that this man is actually involved and not just a case of mistaken identity or a person turned in by an angry Ex?
 
Chapter 1/4

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
263
Guests online
2,049
Total visitors
2,312

Forum statistics

Threads
644,182
Messages
18,812,439
Members
245,319
Latest member
Atinygirl
Top