I don't know much, but if I do know something, im happy to share!!Oh, interesting, that's how you have such incredible expertise with cybersecurity. Thanks for educating all of us!
I don't know much, but if I do know something, im happy to share!!Oh, interesting, that's how you have such incredible expertise with cybersecurity. Thanks for educating all of us!
I still don't understand why DNA testing from a roadside glove is eliciting regular updates to the public.NEW: The DNA from the glove in Nancy Guthrie case is still undergoing quality control in the Sheriff’s private lab in Florida after being sent from Tucson on 2/12. It is expected to be inputed into FBI CODIS in the near future, an FBI official tells me.
AB still has her video up with the thumbnail picture that states....
Son-in-law "Prime Suspect"
They were just beginning their investigation when AB leaked this information to the world.
There is a reason that LE do not name potential persons of interest and/or POI's until they are ready. It could not only harm the investigation but the victim and potentially innocent people.
And sad to say, even though TC has been cleared there will always be those who continue to think and/or accuse him of being involved thanks in huge part to AB.
Im a quiet deleter!! Haha When im wrong, im wrong. And i can handle it!!I prefer the ones who quietly delete as opposed to the ones who dig their heels in and continue to insist upon their pet theories, facts be damned.
Maybe this is true. Hard knowing these days . . . I hope that the FBI already has the DNA from the glove and that the FBI is finishing up their quality control and getting the DNA inputted into CODIS. JMONEW: The DNA from the glove in Nancy Guthrie case is still undergoing quality control in the Sheriff’s private lab in Florida after being sent from Tucson on 2/12. It is expected to be inputed into FBI CODIS in the near future, an FBI official tells me.
Seems like all of this was part of the investigating. I believe this was part of them eliminating him as a person of interest.If he wasn’t a suspect, why were police at his house taking photos for over 3 hours? Why were they going door to door in his neighbourhood asking people if they could check their backyards?
Agree. She had a source that she trusted who gave her the information she reported. Everybody was still a suspect at that time, and also at that time, LE was conducting searches in the property near that family member as well as in that family member's house. It's plausible that she was given correct information at that moment but then things changed somewhat rapidly.These media folks are as human as we are and have the same kinds of biases and make the same kinds of mistakes that we make more often than we care to admit. They also have the same kinds of initial reactions (denial) and instinctive ego defenses ("but this or that therefore this still might be true") that we use when we're wrong. I find that as I age that I become more forgiving of folks for being wrong, because the older I get means the more times I've been wrong and the more times I've had to come to terms with with being wrong and reacting in the same way.
AB didn't defame anyone by believing her source and reporting it. Or even by believing it herself if that was the case. She will only have defamed him if she keeps repeating it after he has been officially cleared and/or someone else is arrested, and most importantly, only if he could then prove an actual calculable injury from it.
JMO.
you're brave to attempt this. there are so, so many shoes out there.I'm not sure if there's been any discussion of the suspect's shoes. I went through the footage and grabbed a few screenshots. A couple of things stood out to me:
1. No visible laces
2. Flat heel/ molded platform sole
3. Traditional-style moc toe construction
4. Contrasting outsole, likely rubber
5. Toe spring (or bumper)
6. Non-leather material. Probably canvas or mesh.
I don't know how helpful it is, but the closest match I could find was the Carhartt Men's Haslett Moc Toe Boot in black canvas..
(FWIW, I used to sell shoes)
View attachment 645737View attachment 645738View attachment 645739View attachment 645740View attachment 645741
I’m surprised we have any information as to whether or not the DNA has been entered into CODIS. I’m not used to LE sharing a blow by blow of their investigation. Sure, if they need footage from residents’ cameras, or have identified someone that they need to speak to and ask for the public’s help, I can see them putting out a request.You don’t expect them to announce to the public if they found a match, do you? They will only announce after they have caught the guy.
I thought the 24 hours included the "quality control" and it's been way past 24 hours. JMOThis is way beyond frustrating. What is earth is “quality control”, and how long does it take?? The last I heard was up to 24 hours. That glove went out days ago.
Argh…
Lord. It looks almost as if the sheriff is stalling the investigation. It's like referees in college basketball. Is it corruption or just incompetence? There's no way for us to know for sure.NEW: "Unnecessary delays" in getting DNA from glove in Nancy Guthrie case into FBI database --
The decision to send the glove with DNA to a private lab in Florida is causing what one source familiar with the case calls “unnecessary delays” in getting the DNA entered into the FBI’s CODIS database.
That’s because the FBI does not accept DNA submissions directly from private labs. Instead, once testing is complete in Florida, it’s likely the DNA data extracted must first be sent back to the state system in Arizona where it can be uploaded and becomes shareable with the FBI for entry into CODIS.
That extra step adds time creating what the source describes as a “catch-up” process when the FBI could have processed and entered the data within a day, according to the source.
i disagree with all the respect i have. AB did something very very foolish in the name of being the first to break the hot story — that’s no better than some of the more salacious tabloids we come across. journalism in these spaces have got to do better. these are real people going through the worst time of their lives.Agree. She had a source that she trusted who gave her the information she reported. Everybody was still a suspect at that time, and also at that time, LE was conducting searches in the property near that family member as well as in that family member's house. It's plausible that she was given correct information at that moment but then things changed somewhat rapidly.
It's got to be hard to be a media person who has to make decisions in the moment as to what is true and to be trusted, and what needs much more investigation before reporting on it.
JMO
Something happened in my hometown years ago. An elderly man's CNA told others "he had money". They broke in to rob him and killed him. I can't recall if she shared it in casual conversation or as part of a set up.My family member is a locksmith - recently he had to sort out the locks on behalf of the police for a victim of crime. The reason the elderly couple had a home invasion is because their carer (woman) provided information to the criminals.![]()
NEW: "Unnecessary delays" in getting DNA from glove in Nancy Guthrie case into FBI database --
The decision to send the glove with DNA to a private lab in Florida is causing what one source familiar with the case calls “unnecessary delays” in getting the DNA entered into the FBI’s CODIS database.
That’s because the FBI does not accept DNA submissions directly from private labs. Instead, once testing is complete in Florida, it’s likely the DNA data extracted must first be sent back to the state system in Arizona where it can be uploaded and becomes shareable with the FBI for entry into CODIS.
That extra step adds time creating what the source describes as a “catch-up” process when the FBI could have processed and entered the data within a day, according to the source.