• #15,501
  • #15,502
Ransom deadline is now six minutes away.
 
  • #15,503
  • #15,504
  • #15,505
Or, perhaps SIL and AG are completely innocent and want to help because they're unconcerned about anything being found?
Anything is possible, but the LE concentration on them is typical of not being able to rule them out. That suggests digital footprints and alibi aren't readily available for either of them.

Couple that with some of the financial entanglements they have with NG and it begins to look like motive.
 
  • #15,506
Page #777.
Maybe we'll get lucky.
I don't want to get to #1,000.
Please bring Nancy home, and if that's not possible please give SG a resolution of this mystery!
 
  • #15,507
JP Getty III, Jaycee Dugard...

Answer: it's been a very long while. Most are children. I keep thinking, why take an 80+ grandmother? I suppose it's unlikely that she would try to escape, but there's a possibility that she could die of a heart attack, simply from the stress. She's such an odd victim. Was it a crime of opportunity, or was someone holding a grudge against her or a family member?
Sadly I thought of the Charles Lindbergh child kidnapping in the early 1930s. Circa 1932 IIRC? :( MOO
 
  • #15,508
Right not "required" but LE would always cover their bases and have one incase a defense attorney would later claim this or that wasn't agreed.

I will be honest, I am not sure that we can assume this LE group would cover their bases based on what they've done so far. I would like to *think* so. But I am not sure enough to assume that.
 
  • #15,509
Have the family take lie detector tests..then eliminate them for the time being.

Absolutely. 100% Lie Detectors should have been administered to the family right-off-the-bat. Eliminate them first. Then branch out from there. Unless someone fails.
 
  • #15,510
Then all investigations are victim blaming, as statistically it is your family and friends that are most likely to commit a crime against you, and that's where LE and media always look first.

The last people seen with the missing person are the daughter and son in law.. The investigators are obviously looking at that and since they haven't publicly excluded them speculation will run rampant. For those innocent it sucks, I get it.That's "web sleuthing". It is what it is.

What further complicates this case is we really don't know what happened. If there was an actual abduction, if there was another initial crime, if the ransom angle is an unrelated opportunistic scam. It just is still in essence a missing person. The investigation has shed no definitive light on these issues yet, and have no obligation to the public. Again, it is what it is.
She's gone SOMEONE took her. Motivation and circumstances unknown. If it isn't an abduction what exactly is it?
 
  • #15,511
T minus 3 minutes.
 
  • #15,512
  • #15,513
  • #15,514
Excellent post!
This sheriff's office appears woefully deficient in investigative talent.
Poor Nancy.
And where's the FBI??
It's looking more and more like a cold case that we might still be commenting on ten years from now.
The FBI joined and took control on day 2.
 
  • #15,515
dbm
 
  • #15,516
I'm not sure exactly what we are to expect at that moment? I'm honestly asking. IMO
You will hear a dud firecracker softly go poof☁️
Then searchers will get back to work, try to find NG’s body.
Continue search for killer.
JMO
 
  • #15,517
And we're at 7pm EST
 
  • #15,518
Ah
 
  • #15,519
In other words, we might update you sometime...or not.
Thanks, Sheriff. Sorry to bother you. We wouldn't want you to miss any basketball games.
Moo....what is the issue with him going to a basketball game.? Separating work from personal life is a good thing...moo
 
Last edited:
  • #15,520
Chapter 1/4

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
156
Guests online
2,570
Total visitors
2,726

Forum statistics

Threads
644,428
Messages
18,817,031
Members
245,351
Latest member
COLDANDMISSINGCANADA
Top