AZ Nancy Guthrie, 84, (mother of TODAY Show host Savannah Guthrie) missing - last seen in the Catalina foothills area on Jan 31, 2026

  • #2,861
  • #2,862
  • #2,863
This is why I thought it was weird they turned over the house so soon.

It’s very common for law enforcement to return to a scene like this after gathering more information (lab results, tips, etc).

Assuming of course they plan to enter the house.
What do you make of that?
 
  • #2,864
  • #2,865
  • #2,866
The picture of the blood splattering and drops bother me; and, what appears to be a couple of stems of flowers. I would pick flowers along my walkway into my home even if it’s just a few.

It’s almost as if she was hit/pushed entering the home, stretched her arms out to brace for the fall and left the flowers. While trying to stand the blood droplets began appearing.

I tried imagining it as if she was exiting the home, but the position of the flower stems does not make sense, nor does the blood splatter.

Is this type of flower along the pathway into her home?
 

Attachments

  • Nancy Guthries porch.webp
    Nancy Guthries porch.webp
    79.9 KB · Views: 96
  • #2,867
  • #2,868
  • #2,869
IIRC the sheriff stated at the PC yesterday that they were still waiting for the company to send them the footage. Hopefully by now they've been able to review the footage, although whether LE discloses their findings might depend on the stage their investigation is in.
Presumably, if the video footage showed the perpetrator(s), the case would essentially be solved and there would be an arrest already. Although since NG hasn't been located and could possibly be alive, I suppose there could be reasons to sit on the information for a short time. Unfortunately, I fear that the longer this goes on, the less likely there will be a favorable outcome.
 
  • #2,870
  • #2,871
We may have more news tonight and not tomorrow.
 
  • #2,872
I wonder if someone is talking. This is terrible for the family
 
  • #2,873
The picture of the blood splattering and drops bother me; and, what appears to be a couple of stems of flowers. I would pick flowers along my walkway into my home even if it’s just a few.

It’s almost as if she was hit/pushed entering the home, stretched her arms out to brace for the fall and left the flowers. While trying to stand the blood droplets began appearing.

I tried imagining it as if she was exiting the home, but the position of the flower stems does not make sense, nor does the blood splatter.

Is this type of flower along the pathway into her home?
As far as the location of the blood, I've thought that perhaps if there are two doors there, inner and outer, the abductor was holding on to her while they shut the door, inner, behind them. The blood drops are SO close to the door it appeared 'not right' for someone to be standing right 'on top' of the door . IMO
 
  • #2,874
 
  • #2,875
  • #2,876
AB sure got some views with that 'bombshell' from an 'impeccable source'.... as other's have said, if it's true, what a scoop for her new platform. I've always liked her, never thought of her as a reckless journalist. 🤷‍♀️
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-02-04 at 18-29-05 Ashleigh Banfield x Drop Dead Serious - YouTube.webp
    Screenshot 2026-02-04 at 18-29-05 Ashleigh Banfield x Drop Dead Serious - YouTube.webp
    14.6 KB · Views: 55
  • #2,877
I lived in Tucson for years and have children that live there now, so I'm confused by the mentions of being rural and unpopulated.

Catalina Foothills is a suburb of the Tucson metropolitan area. I wouldn't consider it unpopulated, it's merely an upscale neighborhood at the base of the mountains with large desert lots, larger homes, and suburban. It's close to trails, resorts, golf, etc.

It's merely 7 miles from the University of Arizona which has 50,000 students.
Yes, I thought someone might not think "unpopulated" is accurate. Just aren't a lot of homes in that neighborhood per the videos. Homes on 1 acre or larger plots it seem. Very spread out.
 
  • #2,878
  • #2,879
I'm sorry, you don't just get a pass if you are her and you come out with this info and it ends up being completely wrong. Journalistic integrity and accountability have to mean something. No one else has come out with similar info, why is that?
Banfield claimed she has two sources: two detectives on the case. If she made it up, that's on her. If the detectives intentionally gave her false or misleading info, that's on them
 
  • #2,880

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
373
Guests online
3,793
Total visitors
4,166

Forum statistics

Threads
639,652
Messages
18,746,604
Members
244,517
Latest member
scooby06doo
Back
Top