- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
- Messages
- 85
- Reaction score
- 957
That was in response to the reporters question "Did you find any other blood in the house?" (paraphrasing).The only DNA evidence they have got back was on the porch.
definitely no....not for me. searching through over 200 threads to try and find what you want is just not...working at all. You're right though, there's no one way that will make everyone happy.I think it's easier to find info when there aren't broken up threads. One search in one thread is a lot easier than going thread by thread with your search criteria. But different strokes for different folks. We all have ways that work best for us.![]()
This may have been answered as I’m still trying to catch up and posts and moving faster than I can in my workday.Question: What does "pacemaker app disconnects from phone" mean? I mean, I know what it means... but I'm trying to understand why it would do that. Thx.
I have been waiting for someone to ask this! Anxious to see responses because I can’t make that align in my mindI am confused by the timeline. The doorbell camera went offline at 1:47, yet a person was detected at 2:12? This is either an error or refers to two different cameras.
No data has been posted nor would it be permitted here as any kind of proof that a Latin American undocumented person is responsible for what happened to NG.Not racist. Just data presented in a factual manner.
I think they should say "movement detected at 2:12 and aren't sure if it is a person or animal" - just my opinonI am confused by the timeline. The doorbell camera went offline at 1:47, yet a person was detected at 2:12? This is either an error or refers to two different cameras.
I can see some value in releasing the timeline details they have released. For example, if this perp is a relative or associate of someone who has worked for NG in the home or on the property and the person who worked for NG has been having some "feelings" that his or her relative or associate is involved, then knowing some precise critical hours when NG was taken might spur them to call LE.Should they be giving all these timeline details to the public??
my notes state the same. he def said person and then went on to say it could be an animal.More from the FBI agent, less from the sheriff please
This is what the sheriff said about that (I was typing while he was talking)
"2:12am software detects person on camera but no video available. no subscription"
Sounds like we're saying the same thing.definitely no....not for me. searching through over 200 threads to try and find what you want is just not...working at all. You're right though, there's no one way that will make everyone happy.
In that case, he would definitely say they couldn't go into it.The point in asking that question would identify if they were looking at anyone. If they liked someone in particular.
Yea, as soon as I saw that "laid in wait" Same.Ugh, having Jennifer Farber Dulos flashbacks.
5 minutes is far from a long time. JMO .
I like him calling reporters Monday morning quarterbacks over and over.He is! I just prefer the "short sweet & to the point" style of the FBI agent.
in this case, I think whoever sent it, took extra steps to not be found or traced.MOO
I feel for the famiky. If the ransom letter is even kind of credible, do they pay up? Risk losing all that money to a fraudster, without getting their mom back?
Normally a ransom letter is a guaranteed scam... but... in this case?
JMO